Tom,
Do you sense that most of the work in the regions covered by Vol5 will continue to go to "brand name" designers for the foreseeable future, or will there be more regional specialists developing? It seems like, at least anecdotally, there have been more and more young Chinese and Thai agronomy interns in the States? Has the % and quality of local talent increased on the crews you use overseas?
I'm not in a good position to answer the last question, because I bring the talent with me for the courses we build, so as not to be handicapped if the locals aren't up to the task.
To the first question, it seems to me that the wealthy of Asia are even more into international name brands than Americans are, so no matter how good the locals are, somebody who wants to sell that they're building a special course almost has to bring in an overseas designer, even if they are no more than a figurehead.
Likewise, all the top Australian clubs want an American consultant, the same way they all wanted MacKenzie's help when he arrived in 1926.
Meanwhile New Zealanders don't care about name brands at all. Luckily for me, the best projects there have been developed by Americans and are not marketed to Kiwis as much as they are to overseas visitors. 😉