Yes, absolutely - with one caveat - that he was healthy. If he's healthy, he's still the best out there.
What I never understood was people saying that this or that can't be done based on conventional wisdom. This is the greatest golfer to ever swing a club. He won 46 times in his 20s - the next best is 30 (Jack). That's a crazy difference. Conventional metrics / comparisons simply don't apply.
Now we're hearing it again. He can't get to 19, he can't do this, no one has won this many Majors over a certain age etc. Newsflash. This is Tiger Woods. He's not like anyone else. He's always done things others thought impossible, and obliterated any records. So why shouldn't he continue to do this? Be the oldest to win a Major, win more Majors than anyone else has after the age of 40.
Assuming he is healthy, which he currently is, then I take him to get to 19+ and 100+. If Vijay Singh can win 22 times in his 40s on the Tour, then Tiger can.
He's the greatest iron player ever, and the players he beat were easily as good (if not better) than the current crop out there. As Duval said earlier in the year in response to all these guys saying they want to go up against Tiger at his best, "the hell they do". He will wipe the floor with them, just like he did with Ernie, Phil etc.
The frightening thing is that this swing is still a work in progress. The iron play is simply fabulous, and the more he plays the better he is going to get. I thought he would win this year, and next year I think it's 4+ wins including a Major.