I think it would be important to have some variety, so I think it should be 10 courses from 10 different architects while also considering different areas, soils, grass types, etc.
1. Pine Valley - Crump/Colt
2. Cypress Point Crystal Downs - MacKenzie
3. Shinnecock Lancaster - Flynn
4. NGLA - C.B. Macdonald
5. Sand Hills - C&C
6. Seminole Pinehurst #2 - Ross
7. Pacific Dunes High Pointe - Doak
8. San Francisco GC - Tillinghast
9. LACC (North) - Thomas Prairie Dunes - Maxwell
10. Boston GC - Hanse Shadow Creek - Fazio
With my apologies to Tom.
How did I forget Prairie Dunes? When I started making the ten, it was going to be in there, and then I forgot...
I can't imagine any serious study of golf course architecture in the United States, limited to 10 courses, not including Oakmont and Merion (East).
Not only is no overview complete without Oakmont and Merion, ANGC also has to be included.
The MacK at ANGC represents a different design mindset from the MacK at Cypress. Both are essential to an overview of American gca.
Bob
For Oakmont, what would I learn there that I can't elsewhere? Have 5 bunkers on each side of the fairway on most holes? The green complexes are unique, but I could say that about my 10 plus others.
For Merion, I wouldn't recommend it until it gets un-USGA-ified.
I would recommend Pasatiempo or Crystal Downs over ANGC. ANGC is not the course it used to be. Way too many hands in the cookie jar.
No Raynor or Dye on my list hurts. I think we can all agree that narrowing it down to 10 is really hard.
Matthew--Very good list, but how about Yale instead of National to get a better look at Raynor's influence, along with Macdonald? (I guess you get a little of both architects with both courses.)
I am 100% willing to concede to adding Yale to the list. I have no argument against it.
I also switched Seminole to Pinehurst #2 because Garland changed it and I am also 100% willing to concede to adding it, too.