I have definitely learned several things from my effort to start a discussion.
First what people initially see overwhelms their thinking. My masthead was simply meant to catch attention and provide a ready reference as opposed to the actual subject. I blew that one. Second that gorse is worth talking about and there are some valuable comments.
BUT GORSE IS NOT WHAT THIS POST WAS ABOUT.
Tom did respond to my actual question. As far as Jerry's comments there is often no chance of recovery from gorse( or densely planted azaleas, rhododendrons, viburnum, etc.) However judiciously planted shrubby clumps rather than ribbons of the stuff lining a fairway do not in my mind constitute an unfair hazard any more that water whether burne or pond; one can always take an unplayable. And only the careless player need be penalized.
Consider the 18th at R County Down. The preferred angle is from the left as the fat of the green presents itself. But intermittant stands of gorse really make that placement dicey. And one can sometimes play out as Colt Knost discovered at the 2007 Walker Cup. Was he happy that two smirking Irish fans adjacent to his ball took a special delight that his forward shot was conveniently blocked by a large shrub? No as evidenced by his invocation of the fbomb as a fan greeting and the subsequent remonstrance of his action by the American Capt. But the gorse that hid the alleged interference by the local did allow recovery.
But I digress. I reflect on this because I am always curious what elevates a very good golf course to a great golf course. In my mind detailing , not in the Tom Fazio eye candy way, but with good basic design principles incorporated, can be one more box to tick.