News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Niall C

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: National Club Golfer's GB&I Top 100 For Fun
« Reply #50 on: March 06, 2020, 06:30:51 AM »

In contrast to Ireland to my reckoning Scotland has 41. Is that an over provision for Scotland ? Probably but what I think is more skewed is that there are 35 seaside/links courses as opposed to 6 inland and absolutely no (Scottish) big city courses unless you include Murcar.

You can argue the relative merits but to me there is a whole plethora of courses that simply get by-passed because of where they are. Statistically they can't all be bad or no fun. ???

Niall

Not because of where they are, but because of what they are. Links courses are fun! I would posit that people travel to play links courses more than they travel to play inland courses, because links courses are fun. Therefore, it is only natural for links courses to appear in such a list at a much higher rate than inland courses.

Certainly most everyone that is member of this website understands why links courses are more fun than inland courses, so I don't need to go into that.


Garland


A links course isn't necessarily fun just because it's a links. Yes, links have got natural advantages but you'll find that a lot of inland courses have some funky contours and fine turf as well. Just because they aren't a holiday destination doesn't mean they aren't good or fun. And while I appreciate time is too short to play every course, you do yourself a dis-service by simply ignoring some really fun courses just because of where they are located.


Niall

Duncan Cheslett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: National Club Golfer's GB&I Top 100 For Fun
« Reply #51 on: March 08, 2020, 12:05:01 AM »
Duncan

Do you think Cavendish feels or plays like a moorland course? To me it feels very much a parkland course. That said, every heathland course has varying degrees of parkland feel because of too many trees, wrong mix of grass and less than ideal rough management.



Ever the contrarian! 😉

I’ve never heard anyone ever suggest before that Cavendish is anything other than a moorland course, and certainly not a parkland!

It is quintessential moorland - prior to being a golf course the land was grazed by sheep and the surrounding properties still are. The turf is predominately fescue and bent grass and there is little to no sign of green lushness.

Recent aeration work has resolved the issue of surface water retention on the fairways and this winter Cavendish has been one of the driest courses in the region. It is certainly drier than both Conwy and Delamere Forest, both of which I have squelched around in the last few weeks!

Extensive tree clearance is beginning to open up views across the course and to reveal more of the majestic Scots Pines in the Horseshoe Woods which had become shrouded in crappy silver birch.


There are even signs of heather beginning to regain a hold in places.

I will accept that the course isn’t up on the hilltops and instead lies on the lower slopes of the surrounding moors, but its character is unquestionably defined by its moorland setting.

Parkland?

Pah!
😉

« Last Edit: March 08, 2020, 12:35:42 AM by Duncan Cheslett »