News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Adam Lawrence

  • Karma: +0/-0
A pair of Shorts
« on: December 21, 2017, 11:21:13 AM »

Those of you who see my postings on various social media sites will know that I've been sharing a lot of historic images recently.


I'd put more of them on here but having to upload them to photo sharing sites is a pain.


But this is so cool i wanted everyone here to see it. For your delectation: the fifth at Royal West Norfolk, the model for Macdonald's Short hole, and the Short at NGLA, side by side. 1912.


« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 11:25:09 AM by Adam Lawrence »
Adam Lawrence

Editor, Golf Course Architecture
www.golfcoursearchitecture.net

Principal, Oxford Golf Consulting
www.oxfordgolfconsulting.com

Author, 'More Enduring Than Brass: a biography of Harry Colt' (forthcoming).

Short words are best, and the old words, when short, are the best of all.

MCirba

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2017, 11:26:20 AM »
Wow.

Brilliant.

Prefer the intimidation of the slightly uphill on the original, but both look awesome.

Thanks for sharing.
"Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent" - Calvin Coolidge

https://cobbscreek.org/

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2017, 12:01:20 PM »
Adam:


That's a great find. 


[For others:  the hole at Brancaster is today's fourth ... two of the early holes were combined into one longer one, and today's 6th added to the routing to get back to eighteen.]


I've often wondered whether Macdonald got his idea for the "horseshoe" mound in the green from the original Brancaster hole, or from somewhere else, or if it was his own idea.  There is no trace of such contours at Brancaster today.  However, the horizon of the putting surface in that picture does seem to suggest a similar shape.




Adam Lawrence

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2017, 12:13:52 PM »
Tom


Tommy N just said something similar on Facebook; I think it's a bit of a stretch. It may be true, but I don't really think the photo offers enough evidence to reach that conclusion. You're talking about a shot from about the level of the green, maybe even slightly below, and a hundred and odd yards away. I'd be seriously hesitant about drawing any conclusions on the green from that.
Adam Lawrence

Editor, Golf Course Architecture
www.golfcoursearchitecture.net

Principal, Oxford Golf Consulting
www.oxfordgolfconsulting.com

Author, 'More Enduring Than Brass: a biography of Harry Colt' (forthcoming).

Short words are best, and the old words, when short, are the best of all.

Thomas Dai

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2017, 12:14:45 PM »
Great posting of the old pics Adam.
Maybe, given the hassle in photo-posting herein, the GCA Facebook site would be a good place for an archive of old course photos?
Nice to have an accessible store of them, something like the long term thread for old maps and routings etc, but for photos.
Atb

Jeff_Brauer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2017, 12:31:15 PM »

Not clear from TD's post, did they lengthen the short hole, or some other hole? 


If so, who likes short shorts? :)
Jeff Brauer, ASGCA Director of Outreach

Peter Pallotta

Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2017, 12:43:38 PM »
Edit - I had it totally backwards and upside down!

Peter   


« Last Edit: December 21, 2017, 09:08:12 PM by Peter Pallotta »

Jeff Loh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2017, 02:55:02 PM »
Thanks Adam!!
That's what GCA is all about.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2017, 08:25:38 PM »

Not clear from TD's post, did they lengthen the short hole, or some other hole? 



Jeff:


The par-3 at Brancaster is still pretty short:  129 yards.  The number of the hole changed because they combined the original 3rd and 4th holes together to add length to the course as a whole.


Adam:


I agree with you that the photo is not adequate proof of the Brancaster green's contours.  I was just surprised to see that it might be a possibility.  I'd always assumed that the green contours at National were a figment of Macdonald's imagination.

Terry Lavin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2017, 09:52:17 PM »
Great digging, so to speak!
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.  H.L. Mencken

Tom Bacsanyi

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2017, 11:20:37 PM »
So National's Short was bulkheaded?  When did they move away from that to the current sod faced look?
Don't play too much golf. Two rounds a day are plenty.

--Harry Vardon

Neil Regan

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts
« Reply #11 on: December 22, 2017, 01:16:21 AM »

I agree that you can not conclude too much from the photo.
But it sure looks like the spectator on the green’s edge is way higher than the caddie on the right part of the green.
It also looks like a pretty significant transition from the golfers on the left to the caddie.




Grass speed  <>  Green Speed

MCirba

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A pair of Shorts New
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2017, 06:35:48 AM »
Do you see what I see,
(Do you see what I see)
Way up on that green, Shepherd Boy?

A mound, A mound
Designed just to confound,
It will bring us such a wicked plight,
In which GCA nerds will all delight,
Or am I just losing my sight?




Happy Holidays, my fellow crazies!   ;) ;D
« Last Edit: December 22, 2017, 08:33:14 AM by MCirba »
"Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent" - Calvin Coolidge

https://cobbscreek.org/