Sweeping generalizations, while convenient and easy, are rarely accurate or helpful. This thread is a textbook case of all of that.
Yours being one of the rare ones, presumably.
A quick story for your consideration, Astravides. (And I take your point about the irony of my post.)
A number of years ago, I was a high school golf coach. Most of my players were members at a club nearby, which let us practice and play there. The club had entered into a yearly Ryder Cup style competition with a well-known club in Scotland (which I shall decline to name here); the first year it was played in Scotland, and the second year it was to be played in Georgia.
The pro at our local club "asked" me to get my players to serve as forecaddies for the Scottish players for the two days, and I of course agreed; I gave my players no choice in the matter. So Sunday afternoon, I decided to ride over to the club to watch a bit, and to thank my players for cooperating.
When I walked out on the course to where the first group was playing, to my surprise I saw my player riding on the back of a golf cart and the two Scotsmen riding in the cart. Same thing with the second group, and then the third. Finally, I asked one of my kids what was going on, and he said that NOT ONE of the Scottish golfers had walked either day. (FWIW, the Americans were approximately equally split between riders and walkers, and the course is one that is easily walked.)
Of course, on GCA, the purity and sanctity of walking in the UK is gospel, and the demand by US golfers to ride is almost the same in reverse. Those threads always make me laugh, and so does one in which generalizations are made about how Americans view golf versus how Scots view golf.
I suspect that Scottish golfers come in all varieties, just as do American golfers. I have seen American golfers exhibit remarkable character on the golf course, and I've seen American golfers exhibit a complete lack of character as well. And I suspect that there are Scots who view golf as a test of their skill, rather than their character; I have one Scottish professional in mind as I write that, btw.
I admit freely that generalizations become such by virtue of grains of truth, tendencies, trends, and the like, and perhaps this is one of those instances. But I rather doubt it.