Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.
What type of grass is on fairways right now at Shinnecock? Was it necessary to cut out the existing grass and sod fescue? Will they reverse that post US Open? Will they leave a variety that can be cut to fw height and also left higher for rough as needed?
I thought I read there were 10 new tees; anyone know which holes they are?
Quote from: MClutterbuck on October 02, 2017, 06:22:43 PMWhat type of grass is on fairways right now at Shinnecock? Was it necessary to cut out the existing grass and sod fescue? Will they reverse that post US Open? Will they leave a variety that can be cut to fw height and also left higher for rough as needed?The fairways are almost certainly poa annua with maybe some bent unless they were regrassed recently (which I doubt). Yes it was then necessary to cut it out, because a bent poa mix grown up to rough height would be a disgusting salad.
Would it make sense to leave fescues o fairway that can be cut to fairway height and left to grow again when needed? Maybe adding some tall fescue seed for US Open?
Quote from: MClutterbuck on October 03, 2017, 02:19:22 PMWould it make sense to leave fescues o fairway that can be cut to fairway height and left to grow again when needed? Maybe adding some tall fescue seed for US Open?I am no fescue expert, but my guess is the best performing fescues for rough height are different from the best performing fescues for fairway height. My guess is also that Shinny will use fescue sod that is as close as possible to what their rough is currently, which is probably an old species that might not tolerate mowing down to fairway height. Plus if you scalp the rough down to fairway height (assuming it is a species that will allow it) it will look pretty ugly for about a month or so, then it will look much different from the adjacent bent/poa fairway (greener/purer). I think the theorizing is all pointless though, because I doubt that the lost width will be restored. I'm sure the membership will want to play the open setup immediately following the event, and any plans to immediately disrupt the playing surface yet again will be quashed. So in the end, you have a course that had narrowed significantly over the years, some nice width was restored, the USGA backtracked that width somewhat but not to any kind of extreme. Seeing as Open hosting is part of Shinnecock's lore/history/ethos, I think it's fine. No reason for anybody to go drowning themselves in Peconic Bay.