I've actually been intrigued by this question as the Ross course I played for 20 years in Topeka has an interesting solution to the "problem."
Holes 1, 2, 7, 14, and 17 are all played toward a corner of the property.
But none of them actually end up with a course boundary on two sides of the green.
On 1 and 2 the boundary is on the left, with plenty of room behind the green.
The first has the 2 tee there. The 2nd sort of has an open in back of the green space that's behind the 5th tee.
No. 7 has the boundary behind the green but the 8th is to the left, where the other boundary is.
On 14 the green is located 30+ yards to the right of the corner, with OB behind the green.
No. 17 has the 18 tee behind the green and is still 30 yards from the left OB fence.
What's interesting is that Ross didn't stuff a single tee box back into a corner. Although 2 and 18 are currently backed into a corner neither of them were originally. No. 18 has two tees side-by-side and the one furthest from OB is the better one, and it's almost certainly original, given the location of the others on the course.
The No. 1 green, which currently is close to boundary on the left, has been moved 30-40 yards to get to that position, and the 2 tee was moved at the same time.
So the course plays into a total of FIVE corners and in his original routing he managed to avoid having either greens or tees in those corners. All of that on a property of about 120 acres.
The man was a genius.
Oh, and unlike more than a few modern archies, it's obvious that he knew where the prevailing winds were, because it plays WAY harder in the winter with NW winds than it does in typical SW winds of Kansas summer.
K