News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Redan, can we get enough!
« on: October 08, 2003, 02:48:49 PM »
I know it has only been a month or so since the 15th at N Berwick had its run in the sun again. One of my posts noted how I favor the flat area between the front trap and the green as opposed to the swale at N Berwick. Another point which may have been lost  there is my love of a down hill version versus the original which is a blind shot. It is one of my favorite shots in golf to watch a ball feed to the hole. The Redan is one of the those holes and I would love to watch the movement of the ball as it lands and feeds for good and bad. The same is true for the partially blind(if hitting from the middle to right side of the fairway) 2nd shot on 8 at Dornoch. It is a joy to watch the ball feed there too.

Brian Phillips

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2003, 04:15:07 PM »
Tiger,

The Redan is supposed to be an uphill shot that is why it is called a Redan.  It is supposed to be some sort of fortress that cannot be beaten.

I lost count how many times I have played the hole in the last 12 months and I have not seen one birdie!

To be honest it was one of my great dissappointments of my arrival in Scotland to see that it was blind!  I would design the hole with the two fairway bunkers lower so you could see the fron part of the green or fore green.

However, after many times playing the hole and I have only not hit the green twice I fell in love with it again.  It is one of those annoying holes that will drive Darren Kilfara nuts when he moves there next year. ;D

Brian

A redan is only a redan if played at least slightly uphill.
Bunkers, if they be good bunkers, and bunkers of strong character, refuse to be disregarded, and insist on asserting themselves; they do not mind being avoided, but they decline to be ignored - John Low Concerning Golf

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2003, 05:39:51 PM »
John, if you like a downhill version of the famous Redan, you will love the version at Southern Dunes in Orlando on the back nine.  It's short, I hit 8-iron, and severely tilted right to left and front to back.  You can really see the ball rolling across the green.  You will be very happy!  I was unhappy because the ball rolled straight across and somehow hooked the froghair and stayed up there behind the hole!  From there it was a simple three putt for bogey!   ::)

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2003, 08:21:38 PM »
John - I played the downhill, ass-backwards, L to R Redan at Sleepy Hollow last week - not very hard but a fun hole to play - the way the ball funnels onto the green from the approach area is neat. The green falls off pretty good good so it is sort of a long speed-putt. That was the first reversed Redan Macdonald/Raynor built.

I'm not much a fan of these.

Interesting to note though, is that Banks felt you should be able to see the ball land so a lot of his Redans are with higher tees .............   (he didn't really "get it" - hah)
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

Adam_Messix

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2003, 08:44:00 PM »
Brian--

In Brian Silva's tribute to Raynor at Black Creek, he built a classic slightly uphill reverse redan on #7 and a drop shot redan at #11.  

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2003, 09:34:57 AM »
George I am so glad that Banks did not get it. lol I actually like the right to left redan better than the reverse too. I have always felt it is much easier to land a fade softly over a draw. lol Brian you point is well founded. I did confuse two concepts. The necesity or lack therof of the blindness versus the pleasure of a par 3 where you can enjoy watching the ball feed to the hole. I really do not like the blindiness but love the defense concept, ie the redan of it all. I took it a step further by accident by drifting into a sea of fun shots where the green complexes allow for a lot of funneling or tracking to the hole. Bill, thank I need to play there soon. My trips to orlando have been mostly practicing at the new Norman course at Ritz and Faldo. I am about to run out of visiting privileges in Orlando though. It has been 8 months now and surely she is ready to say adios.

Scratch_Nathan

Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2003, 04:06:05 PM »
Nice downhill reverse redan at The Creek.  I think difficulty is a little milder than most but a very satisfying hole to play.




Brian Phillips

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2003, 04:30:21 PM »
Now guys not to get too pushy over this but there is no such thing as a downhill Redan.  I do not care waht has been built and what others have called it.  You cannot have a downhill Redan.  Why?  Because it means it can be attacked to easily from above.

No one in their right mind would build a fortress that can be attacked from above would they? At least not in the old days.

Don't let anyone tell that a hole is a Redan if played form above then all it becomes is a green with bunkers on the inside nothing else.

I will argue this to my grave.

Brian
Bunkers, if they be good bunkers, and bunkers of strong character, refuse to be disregarded, and insist on asserting themselves; they do not mind being avoided, but they decline to be ignored - John Low Concerning Golf

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2003, 05:01:30 PM »
Brian, the redan is not uphill, it is merely blind by the way the front trap is set. I believe if the mound in front were 5 feet lower you could see all but the back half of the green from the tee. 8 feet lower and you can see it all and be as I would like it better not form a difficulty of shot view but a visaul pleasure point of view. I like to see and touch women too. We men are visual creatures. lol

Brian Phillips

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2003, 05:06:41 PM »
The green of the Redan is uphill from the tee and I am willing to put money on it.

 ;D

Brian
Bunkers, if they be good bunkers, and bunkers of strong character, refuse to be disregarded, and insist on asserting themselves; they do not mind being avoided, but they decline to be ignored - John Low Concerning Golf

Bob_Huntley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2003, 05:08:37 PM »
Brian,

You are right. Anyone thinking differently should go to Google or Teoma and look up Redan Fortification in the Crimea. There is also some interesting maps of Redans in the Civil War section of most search engines.

I can think of no redoubt which can be attacked from above.  

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2003, 05:51:45 PM »
Brian Phillips,

Would you further refine your definition to state that the top of the fronting surface obscures everything behind it ?

How did CBM and SR refer to the 8th at The Creek ?

Brian Phillips

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2003, 01:44:40 AM »
Pat,

Even the lowest part of the green at the back is still above the tee if not on the same level.  The highest part of the area is short and right.  The lowest is probably left and long.  There are three bunkers to right of the green and one bunker protecting the left.

Lets presume the highest point (front right) is supposed to be where you place a fortification.  The green is 42 yards long and when you look to the left while stood on the middle of the green the next tee is not that much higher than the green itself.

Brian

« Last Edit: October 10, 2003, 01:46:57 AM by Brian Phillips »
Bunkers, if they be good bunkers, and bunkers of strong character, refuse to be disregarded, and insist on asserting themselves; they do not mind being avoided, but they decline to be ignored - John Low Concerning Golf

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2003, 08:24:21 AM »
Brian I think you are correct in a spitting hairs kind of way. Yes it is uphill but not so much so that if you could see the front of the green you could see your shot land and if you were a few feet higher you could see the entire green. My point is about visual not to debate your point which i agree with notwithstanding my mistaken comment above.

Scratch_Nathan

Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2003, 08:55:10 AM »
Since architects build (and name) golf holes and dictionaries don't, I think the strict uphill mandate for categorizing a hole a redan is pure b.s.

If Charles Blair McDonald or Seth Raynor or Charles Banks call it a redan, it's a redan.

If CBM thought number 8 at Creek is a redan, then it is one.

It's a golf hole, not a fortress, okay?   ;D

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2003, 11:05:38 AM »
Perhaps we are talking about two different things here.

Brian - I agree, a fortress below an enemy is nuts so in the true sense of "redan", no question you are correct. Also to me a Redan should be a blind landing - event the back of the green higher than the tee-box. (surprise, suprise, when you get there and what you thought was a great shot is over the green or in the bunker to the right rear)

A "golf hole Redan" is another thing I think - and here the term gets stretched a lot.

As far as I'm concerned, by comparison, a reversed Redan is a suckie hole (again by comparison to the more definitive, "proper" type).

My friend Gib loves the one at Creek - I like it also but it is really a very different play.

To me this is apples and oranges - both taste good but a different flavor - I like Billy V's analogy: blondes vs brunettes. I like blondes.

More on Redan:

Publishers love to cut stuff out of manuscripts (they're probably right in most cases ??), however, they cut out this sidebar that was to be in my "historical" Redan explanation   :P .... it takes the Redan back beyond Savastapol in the Crimean War to the 1600's (note last paragraph):

**
   History records that the Redan defense-fortification was first introduced during the Crimean War (1854-1856); a war waged by Britain, France, Sardinia, allied with Turkey against the forces of Russia on the north shore of the Black Sea - the Peninsula of Crimea. The war grew out of the growing distrust of Russia's designs on the Turkish Empire. In 1854 Florence Nightingale and her valiant band of nurses arrived at the war zone to assist the casualties suffered by the British in trench warfare during the first terrible winter of the conflict. It was her
dedication in caring for the wounded, and her pioneer work in sanitation and hygiene during this conflict, that established  the modern stringent practices in the nursing profession.
   Weeks later the famous 673 man British Light Brigade won undying fame for its valiant, though unsuccessful suicidal charge through North Valley during the battle of Balaklava, as they attempted to storm the Russian Redan fortification. This military action was honored by Britain's poet laureate, Alfred, Lord Tennyson in 1854 when he wrote of the Charge of the Light
Brigade.
   The French troops captured the important redoubt of Malakov, in what would be the most important battle of the Crimean War. Within a few months, the Russians surrendered
Savastapol and the end of the conflict was at hand.
   Although that particular Redan fortress at Crimea gets much acclaim, Redan design origins stem further back in history, to the late 1600's.  It is believed to be initially designed by Sebastian le Prestre de Vauban, a soldier serving under King Louis XIV of France. Its early
configuration for military use was as a high, "V" shaped rampart with steep sloping sides that would repel cannon balls and discourage storming by foot-soldiers.   8)
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #16 on: October 10, 2003, 04:39:04 PM »
Since it seems to me that the most fun thing about a Redan is seeing your ball (after a properly struck draw!  ;D ) run from right to left toward the protected pin, that the best Redan designs would be such that you could actually see this happen!

The solid Redan-like 14th at Apache Stronghold certainly fits this description, as you play across a valley up to the green, but slightly below the elevation of the tee so you can see the ball hopefully doing what you want.

(Parenthetically, I'm not sure the original Redan at North Berwick allows this happy viewing, but will find out in May during my first visit to the Motherland of golf).   ;)

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #17 on: October 10, 2003, 07:59:13 PM »
Bill McBride,

I would think the opposite, and that is why I asked Brian Philips to amend his definition, which I agree with.

If a redan green tilted to let you view the entire roll of the ball on the green, the "true" high front right to lower back left configuration of the redan green would be lost.

The 4th at NGLA is a perfect example, the 3rd at Piping Rock and the 7th at Westhampton aren't bad either.

The 2nd at Somerset Hills would probably be more to your liking. as would the reverse, pseudo redan at # 8 at The Creek.

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #18 on: October 10, 2003, 11:21:19 PM »
Pat, you're missing my point.  The fun of the shot into the Redan is watching the ball roll from right to left.  If the shot is concealed, it's not as much fun.  If you don't agree that the fun of the shot is seeing it, then you're right, the traditional uphill shot is great.  But once you've seen that shot as I describe it, you might agree that the slightly downhill (maybe level given back to front sloping green) is okay.

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2003, 06:08:07 AM »
Bill McBride,

I understand what you are saying, but, I prefer the mystery, on the fate of your ball, presented by the Redan's I mentioned.

A redan green that sits below the tee would be subjected to a ball flight that is a radical departure from the ball flight of a redan green that sits above the tee.

Picture the difference in the approaches to greens # 6 and
# 8 at NGLA.

Thus the very play of the hole is radically different,
with the hole with the green below the tee much less of a challenge,

But, that's just my opinion.

TEPaul

Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2003, 07:56:37 AM »
Bill:

You're not kidding about the "real redan shot" being probably the neatest to see of any I know of. And clearly that shot at NGLA's redan is the ultimate because you can see it and how it works there is so cool. One time in a stroke play qualifying round there me and my fellow competitors (who I didn't even know) got to that hole and decided we all just HAD to try the real redan bounce in and release shot because it's so neat if you can pull it off although it may have been a bit dangerous to try simply because the course was screaming fast and the greens were lightening. So we all basically hit way less club, tried to hit it low and get it on the ground earlier and filter it across almost the entire fairway kicker. We all hit nice shots but one didn't get off the fairway collar but the others broke off it super slow and trickled really slowly left and eventually disappeared behind the top of the redan bunker down towards the pin. On each shot all of us were screaming go GO GO!! for each other's ball! A great experience to say the least. One never got out of the collar and was basically an automatic three putt, one was over the green low and the other two were tap in birdies! The expectation of having to wait while walking up there to see what happened was pretty interesting too. You know how it is when you really hope one of the balls next to the pin is yours and not your fellow competitor's before you get close enough to identify and mark it although of course you can actually say that out loud??  

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2003, 04:04:06 PM »
So I guess my question has to be, how could you see the ball rolling across the green if the shot is uphill?  Or do you see the ball bounce left and then disappear when it gains the green?

Brian Phillips

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2003, 04:31:18 PM »
A tee can be 6 feet below a green and you can still see the ball on a green if you are the same height as Tom.

I am getting a little bit annoyed at the attitude of people here.  A Redan Par 3 is supposed to copy the original Redan right?  

The original Redan is slightly uphill and protected by the bank leading to the green.

I do not care what others say about what a Redan is.  It is uphill, it is protected by that, nothing else apart from the bunker on the lefthand side but honestly you don't think about it unless you are playing a high fade into the hole.

I don't know many that have tried that shot at North Berwick.

Look, no matter what you guys say or do a true Redan is UPHILL...that is it.

Brian
Bunkers, if they be good bunkers, and bunkers of strong character, refuse to be disregarded, and insist on asserting themselves; they do not mind being avoided, but they decline to be ignored - John Low Concerning Golf

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2003, 07:00:22 PM »
Sorry you're annoyed, Brian.  I'll get back to you after I play North Berwick in May!   :D

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Redan, can we get enough!
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2003, 10:08:30 PM »
Bill McBride,

So I guess my question has to be, how could you see the ball rolling across the green if the shot is uphill?

Or do you see the ball bounce left and then disappear when it gains the green?

Now you've got it.

Remember too, that the green is canted away from the front making it impossible to see the ball from the tee, other then at the high right shoulder.

Brian Phillips,

No need to get exacerbated, you're correct.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2003, 10:09:34 PM by Patrick_Mucci »