Lots of different ways to go with the word "great," but I think immediately of two.
There's Tony the Tiger grrrrrrrreat!
And there's Garrick Ollivander, who said to Harry Potter "But I think it is clear that we can expect great things from you. After all, He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named did great things. Terrible! Yes. But great."
Tony's use of it isn't so very involved. It has some very good characteristics, and is therefore grrrrrrreat!
Ollivander, though, is talking about some kind of historical.........heft. So if I think of golf courses in this way, the specific characteristics of a course, the strategy, the bunkering, the routing, might not be as relevant as how the course has been thought of, its importance to the game, or to a specific area. Brookline, for instance, might be considered great because of what transpired there in 1913. There are many other examples.
But that might create situations where one course is a greater course, but not a "better" course. For the purpose of this exercise, I guess I can live with that.