News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Joel_Stewart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« on: April 30, 2017, 07:38:36 PM »

This was pointed out to me the other day.

Sand, water, interesting land movement?








John Kavanaugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2017, 07:44:27 PM »
Is there a better site than Rustic Canyon?

Randy Thompson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2017, 09:08:55 PM »
Boston was good not sure great. Can`t wait to see what C&C do with a por site like Dallas.

Matthew Schulte

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2017, 09:11:08 PM »
I imagine he was happy with what he has had to work with at Streamsong for the Black course.

mike_malone

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2017, 09:44:48 PM »
Applebrook has a site that is as good as one could get.
AKA Mayday

Ryan Coles

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2017, 10:08:19 PM »
Castle Stuart not too bad either.

Josh Stevens

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2017, 10:47:56 PM »
Im curious that you add water to your requirements for a site to be great?  Or do you just mean for irrigation?

Royal Sydney will be a reasonably good site in terms of sand and decent movement, if only it were about 30-50% bigger.  But I am sure he will fit something in there.

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2017, 10:57:07 PM »
I imagine he was happy with what he has had to work with at Streamsong for the Black course.

Its an abandoned strip mine.  Spoil piles aren't exactly Bandon.
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

mark chalfant

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2017, 11:21:41 PM »

I believe  the current  Gil Hanse   site  near Cobbtown,  GA  is excellent.  Lively terrain and good soil.  Jeff Stein and Kyle  Franz think highly of  it.


Though the Hingham site was very challenging  to create/ mold  the final composition is superb.

Ally Mcintosh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2017, 01:30:52 AM »
It's relative.


Most of his sites have been better than 90% of architects even get once.


Of the few courses I've played by him, Craighead was probably the least impressive base site, given that it wasn't sand based and was without huge land movement. But even it was next to the sea with great views and plenty natural features.

Mark Pearce

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2017, 03:56:34 AM »
Of the few courses I've played by him, Craighead was probably the least impressive base site, given that it wasn't sand based and was without huge land movement. But even it was next to the sea with great views and plenty natural features.
And a really cool man-made feature.
In June I will be riding the first three stages of this year's Tour de France route for charity.  630km (394 miles) in three days, with 7800m (25,600 feet) of climbing for the William Wates Memorial Trust (https://rideleloop.org/the-charity/) which supports underprivileged young people.

Matthew Mollica

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2017, 06:42:50 AM »

Royal Sydney will be a reasonably good site in terms of sand and decent movement, if only it were about 30-50% bigger.  But I am sure he will fit something in there.


A high-traffic, existing, over-rated course, to which he's been asked to make modifications. It is a tight plot, with less movement than most would like, fixed clubhouse position, and some boundary issues. The soil is not that great, and the vegetation is not good.



"The truth about golf courses has a slightly different expression for every golfer. Which of them, one might ask, is without the most definitive convictions concerning the merits or deficiencies of the links he plays over? Freedom of criticism is one of the last privileges he is likely to forgo."

Ian Andrew

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2017, 07:04:12 AM »

The one in Georgia is a great site, better than Streamsong, which was a really good site too.
Boston was a great site, split by a road, clearly that bothers others more than me.


But Ally is right, he's seen better than some will ever see already...
With every golf development bubble, the end was unexpected and brutal....

Mike_Clayton

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #13 on: May 01, 2017, 07:32:27 AM »
Rio was a really good site - maybe not great but good enough to make a fantastic course.

Kyle Harris

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #14 on: May 01, 2017, 08:13:58 AM »
I imagine he was happy with what he has had to work with at Streamsong for the Black course.

Its an abandoned strip mine.

Wrong.
http://kylewharris.com

Constantly blamed by 8-handicaps for their 7 missed 12-footers each round.

Thank you for changing the font of your posts. It makes them easier to scroll past.

Ari Techner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2017, 08:29:43 AM »
Is it fair to say that Gil has so far been a disappointment with his original courses? He clearly does a fantastic job with restoration work but it seems his original work is not quite in the same league.

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

Jay Mickle

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #17 on: May 01, 2017, 08:43:52 AM »
The real test will be his new design of the current #4. With #2 adjoining and Mid Pines, Dormie plus other top notch courses in the back yard this will be a defining moment.
@MickleStix on Instagram
MickleStix.com

Paul Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #18 on: May 01, 2017, 08:52:50 AM »
I think Boston Golf Club is a great site
Paul Jones
pauljones@live.com

Mike_Trenham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #19 on: May 01, 2017, 09:35:00 AM »
Applebrook has a site that is as good as one could get.


Not really, it had been land devolved at one point for commercial development so large areas of the site had been flattened significantly he had to undo all of that.
Proud member of a Doak 3.

Ally Mcintosh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #20 on: May 01, 2017, 09:45:03 AM »
I think Boston Golf Club is a great site


I also think Boston Golf Club is a great course. The road thing didn't bother me either.

Tim Martin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #21 on: May 01, 2017, 09:47:02 AM »
I think Boston Golf Club is a great site


I also think Boston Golf Club is a great course. The road thing didn't bother me either.
+1

mike_malone

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #22 on: May 01, 2017, 10:48:01 AM »
Mike Trenham,


 I was referring to that great rolling ground we have around Philly. He didn't have the awkwardness of Inniscrone for sure.
He had challenges at Applebrook but a great course could be built and he did a nice job.
AKA Mayday

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #23 on: May 01, 2017, 11:49:12 AM »
While it seems he's had a lot of good sites, I'm not sure I would call any of those "great".


Great would be something like Bandon or the Sand Hills....





Joel_Stewart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has Gil Hanse ever had a great site?
« Reply #24 on: May 02, 2017, 09:42:11 AM »
Castle Stuart not too bad either.


Seems like this is the obvious choice as his best site.


Some good comments here as well.