Josh,
It is interesting –7-9 and 16-18 parallel each other back to the clubhouse, and with the trees down, comparing them is almost unavoidable as 7/16 are short-ish, downhill par 4s, 8/17 are par 5s and 9/18 are tough two shotters, as you know.
That is certainly what I thought walking around without clubs and without a scorecard. 7 and 16 seemed like kissing cousins, two great ones to be sure but similar. When I got home and studied the scorecard, I was surprised/shocked that 16 is over 80 yards longer than 7. Plus, most golfers stay up a ‘level’ on 16 for their approach and actually hit downhill to the green while 7 is always an uphill approach.
Regarding 8 & 17, the new back tee on 8 makes it potentially a whopping 168 yards longer than 17 (which the big boys play as a par 4 anyway). After additional research, I was surprised to learn that the 8th green is the largest on the course and the only one to measure over 7,000 square feet. The 17th one meanwhile measures 4,700 square feet which is 10% under the median size of their greens.
9 & 18 do have a similar playing qualities. Nonetheless, I thought that all three concluding holes on each nine had similarities but I ended up ‘un-writing’ what I had typed on the flight home.