I'm biased, on several fronts:
1. I have no time for the dysfunctional and scandal-plagued IOC, or for its silver-spooned and highly self-serving members.
2. I've always thought that the Summer Olympics should focus on 4 things only, i.e. a) who can run the farthest, b) who can run the fastest, c) who can lift the heaviest weight, and d) who can swim the best. That's the Olympics the old-school way, the Philippides way.
(And, btw, if you were in the middle of a lake and the boat capsized, who in the hell would choose to butterfly their way to shore and safety? What kind of made-up IOC-driven nonsense is that stroke?)
3. Athletes involved in Olympic sports should be proud of their accomplishments, and I'm quite happy for them -- as people -- when they follow their dreams and succeed; but I've never felt even the slightest duty to "support our athletes" or to "root them on to Olympic Gold". Theirs -- like mine, and like most of ours -- is a selfish pursuit and self-serving profession; most all of us are just trying to make a living at something we like, and not adding very much to the common good whatsoever. We can be happy for each-other for doing well and building a life, but we aren't obliged to stand on the sidelines and cheer, are we? (Except for stock-brokers and investment bakers -- I cheer when one of them makes his first million....)
4. If for at least a couple of decades synchronized swimming and beach volleyball were in the Olympics while golf was not, it is clear that the IOC brings absolutely no moral weight to bear on the issue, and any IOC attempts to foist the responsibility for "growing the game" onto golfers like Rory strike me as disingenuous at best and unethical at worst.
In short, good on Rory for speaking his truth so plainly and clearly, even though he knew some would immediately criticize him for that truth (one that I think every single athlete in every single sport from the beginning of time would probably agree with.)
Peter