Tom - We are probably agreeing on the same thing.
Variety is the key, but what one person thinks is great another thinks is not. We can argue all we want about Golf Course Architecture and we are going to agree on the architectural merits of The Belfry. There are over-riders and 'the people' want to play the one where Sam holed the putt, Nick made an ace blah blah blah. People playing golf on course A B or C has many other factors before you get to the golf course architecture.
What you are wrong on though Tom is I have tried to move people into the way this group here thinks. I am a big fan of your work, I like Coore & Crenshaw too but there are not really other architects who I put on the pedestal I put you on. We have a site where we have 36 holes, one is very much like 'Golf Valley' 'Paris National' the other is a course much more on the wavelength of this group. For every 4 rounds played 3 will be on the one you/this group don't like and that is a fact. It was 1 in 7 so the gap is narrowing. One chap a month ago complained that it was the worse course he had ever encountered and cited reasons for it's badness that are the reasons we like on this forum.
Undulating greens can be over-done, you can have too many and you can create a golf course where you have to think so much you get a near headache. I played that one in Palm Springs that Pete Dye did with the island 17th with the rocks around and it was so hard I actually did have a headache worrying about which side not to miss on. That was almost unenjoyable.
We are in the entertainment business and we have to produce a product to entertain, multiple routes to doing that of course but the BIG MINUS to this forum is that in most eyes the architecture is way down the list and condition is a big over-rider, cart girls, two loops of nine, par 72, buggies, 7000+ yards (from the backs) are box tickers for Joe Public.
The BOTCP test is the box ticker for the corporate world. It is probably the main reason why I get work because people know my golf courses make money, hopefully when I have passed on someone will more understand the architecture that I have included.