Neil 'authenticated' those drawings without ever seeing the originals.
And he vouched for the obviously fake Tillinghast Authentication Report. Dont want to harp on his mistake but this discussion really should be going in other directions. There are many facts of this case that are settled and dont need re-examination.
Interesting to hear that you think the authentication report may be a fake. So a fake authentication report to 'authenticate' a fake set of documents (comprising many plans and thousands of hand written diary pages mind you) brought onto this website for discussion. Yeah, well that seems likely.....
I can assure you that the report is not a fake, and was contributed to by a host of different specialists in their fields from across Britain's top institutions. But don't take my word on that.