Is saving it really the best thing? It’s a 4400-ish yard executive 18 holer. The proposal is to turn it into a 9 hole kids course, six soccer fields, and some commercial developments. I could do without the commercial developments, but I’ll happily sign on to giving kids a place to learn to play golf and also some soccer fields.
I’d be intrigued to see what Tom Doak did with an executive-length 18 holer just like anyone else, but I’m no less intrigued to see what he might do with an executive-length 9 holer. Is losing 9 holes really a big deal, and does it automatically mean that Renaissance won’t be involved?
It just seems to me that if the goal is to provide affordable, youth-friendly golf, a 9 holer does that as well as an 18 holer does. I'd be disappointed if they wanted to get rid of the course altogether, but that doesn't seem to be the case.