Ed
You do me a great disservice by mentioning "Taddy" but not Frilford Heath Red or Green. I haven't been to Tadmarton for a good few years and you mention that it is improving, but then the Red course at Frilford has also greatly improved its bunkering in the last year - 3,5,12,13,14,15, and 18 have all been improved by new / changed bunkering. Interestingly, top100golfcourses ranks the courses in Oxfordshire as below:
1. Frilford Heath Red
2. Huntercombe
3. The Oxfordshire
4 Frilford Heath Green
5. Tadmarton Heath
6. Studley Wood
7. Oxford
I know that 6 months ago the Red course was at number 3. I know people on here, not naming any ex pat American names, will scoff at the rakings for Huntercombe and Oxford above. Leaving that aside, the Red course at Frilford is at least as good as many courses that were reviewed in the book - a Doak 5 for me with the improvements which have caused me to now rate it a notch above the Green.
[/quote]
Hi Ed
As a fellow Frilford member I would have to say the changes to the Red course are not all positive. The new bunker on 12 does not fit in with the original bunkers and detracts from the hole. And the new one on 18 is golf architecture with a blunt instrument. They should have mirrored 18th Green course Bunker.
What do you think of new tees on course Ed ? Personally the one on 13 makes the hole two straight shots instead of drawing ball around the corner off the tee, which takes away from the drive.
Did you play course before the blue was built and first four on Red were changed ?