Goodness, Patrick, if I were what you accuse me of being, I'd have a hard time derailing the 10 or so threads you've started in the past 12 hours. I have to give you credit, because when I had four threads on the front page, I was criticized for such verbosity. Yours are obviously fundamental to the continued evolution of this DB and I hope to read all of them.
I (heavy sigh) guess that it's beneath you to make a list of the Dr. MacKenzie courses you've played. Lord knows it would be an olive branch on your part.
I often lay awake at night, in a dreamlike state, imagining what a debate between you and you would be like. It would remind me of the argument between two notably stubborn Spaniards: one a Basque and the other a Navarren. The Basque said that he could hammer a nail through a cinder-block wall with his head. The Navarren said that he could not. The Basque started banging away and all the bar's patrons gathered round to watch. Although bloodied, the Basque persisted and was two to three blows away from success when the Navarren angrily left the bar. Two blows later, all were poised to celebrate the Basque's somewhat-odd feat of strength and stubbornness. He smashed...and smashed...and smashed, but the nail wouldn't budge. On he hit until he fell over and died, one blow short of success.
"Man, he was so close," they said as the exited the bar...where they found the corpse of the Navarren, dead from smashing the nail back through the cinder block with his head~
Funny story, huh?
Since none of us ever met Dr. MacKenzie in the flesh, we really have no idea how he thought, what his personality was like, and what his favorite holes were. By the by, when did he actually declare that the 16th hole at Pasatiempo was his favorite par four? And why should an architect's favorite holes matter to us? Such a subjective distinction is surely not important to an empirical site such as this one, am I correct?