Chambers Bay looks like an intriguing, unique, fantastic venue.
Given that it is an intriguing, unique, fantastic venue....
why on earth does the Mike Davis, aka The Open Dentist, feel the need to insert himself into the equation so blatantly with all the different setup options?
Changing pars on different holes daily?
I'm all for innovation, but in this case we have an innovative venue already-let's not push the envelope-let's save that for the boring crap we see weekly on the PGA Tour.
Golf has enough bigness.
Chambers Bay is big and bold.
Adding HOURS to practice rounds on an already brutishly difficult course to walk is absolutely the message we don't need to send amateurs and the casual viewing fan.
There are of course situations on classic courses that need adjusting due to the USGA's complete failure at equipment control-I get it, but those are courses decades and more old.
This course is brand new and if anything TOO big already.
Let's see the course played as designed, not at the whimsy of an seemingly increasingly overly involved setup guy.
It is confusing the issue for players and fans.
It's a shame because it seems to me Chambers Bay and its agronomy could be the star, not the setup guy......again.