All this RCD adoration is just a bit much. What about those last three holes? Is there any comparably weak three hole stretch at NGLA?
So unless a course is comparable to NGLA it's not worthy of adoration or discussion?
Seems like it'd be a pretty short discussion if that were the standard-of course given that every third thread is about NGLA anyway, that's pretty close to where we are.
![Roll Eyes ::)](http://golfclubatlas.com/forum/Smileys/classic/rolleyes.gif)
RCD is awesome and worthy of all adoration.
Yes, well, what about those last few holes? Are they awesome?
16 is a short par 4-a chance to gain a shot on a difficult course
17 has a pond-could be a pot bunker or gorse, but it's a pond-that's what nature put there-get over it.
18 has been improved and is a pretty good par 5
there are PLENTY of courses in the UK with average finishes,yet they are still are awesome courses
Sometimes the most unique and spectacular courses have 10-12 standout holes, and a few that simply get you to them and/or balance them out.
The problem is too many people spend all their time at the GCA groupie faves (dornoch, NGLA,TOC,PV,Cruden Bay-talk about a cult fave
![Roll Eyes ::)](http://golfclubatlas.com/forum/Smileys/classic/rolleyes.gif)
etc.) and never experience the unique charms of lesser known, yet ultra interesting places and their culture
The most unmemorable courses strive to have 18 "great" or signature holes (think trump-vomit emoticon), thus greatly reducing the potential ebb and flow of a hidden gem where they might experience some uniqueness splashed with bits of comparative mediocrity
Dunfanaghy comes to mind