Thanks John. I knew I had seen his name somewhere.
(BTW, I haven't read Pulver's series yet. It's hard to read unless you embiggen Joe's pdf's and read them on the screen. They are illegible when I print them.)
That Pulver thought it worthwhile to devote so much ink to a long series of articles on the topic is an indication of just how unresolved the basic principles of gca were at the time in the US. Older Victorian ideas were still mixing it up with more 'modern' ideas. I'm looking forward to reading what Pulver had to say and post later.
Bob