I think the racism angle is moot at this point for South or North in the US in terms of this argument. It's the same important problem everywhere.
What I take issue with is the thinly-veiled "People from Boston are d*cks" idea from a few in this thread. I've never been compelled to say anything against anyone's city on GCA...
Please define "healthy environment". And if Boston is an "unhealthy environment," does the Olympics have a recent history of avoiding "unhealthy environments?" (Athens, Beijing, Sochi...) I'd say Boston's plan is 10x healthier than any of those...
So the locals are only 50-50 so far...if Boston gets it, the dissenters shrug and grumble...it's not like they are assaulting visitors! As for Boston "not being set up to handle the Olympics"....the Plan involves about 75% pre-existing venues, with a swim center, velodrome, and main stadium the major construction points. The swimming and velodrome goes to one of the local colleges (they will share funding I believe), and the Olympic stadium is partly funded by the Krafts to eventually be the soccer stadium for the Revolution. I'm relatively indifferent to the whole idea, but I think the Plan is sound and has addressed many of the initial concerns of the public.
AGAIN, I will try to bring it back to GCA by saying that TCC is head and shoulders the best venue, if golf is still an Olympic sport by then. Maybe have the men play at TCC, and the women at Essex, home of the Curtis sisters and the recent Curtis Cup?