@Tom Doak
"
I'm not sure there's a single person reading Golf Club Atlas who could afford to join. "
The same can be said for Sebonack, Friars Head and many other high end courses at clubs FREQUENTLY mentioned here. If you do a search here, many members of GCA- writers,raters or guests- have played Yellowstone and many of these high end courses. If there's a golf course somewhere, someone here will find a way to get on it and critique it here. And, of course, there are clubs that many wealthy people could not join because they don't have the right connections.
Well, yes, but we talk about those GOLF COURSES, not about the people who think their property at Yellowstone Club is worth $3 billion.
Guys,
I'm sure no less than a few GCA'ers have played the Yellowstone Club course (fwiw.. I have and it's little more than a nice member's course, far from Weiskopf's best). Any meaningful discussion of its merits on this board isn't going to be a long one. Additionally, I rather doubt the $3B number was accurate, instead more likely a P.R./marketing inspired exagerration designed to inflate the egos of its owners, their ever-so-dumb bank lenders and those assorted characters swimming like remora fish attached to the Blixeths. Back in 2008, that was an identifiable trend among resort properties.
As previously mentioned, the surrounding area and facilities are indeed impressive and the skiing is reputed to be fantastic. Ultimately, the skiing property and it's value is what convinced distressed buyers to purchase the debt from the schnooks at Credit Suisse.
What is more interesting, in my estimation, is that the Y Club might well be the absolute contemporary example of an operating microcosm for income inequality. Without taking sides, I find it fascinating that stories like this serve to remind us of what the "haves" are doing behind their elevated fences. Is this much different from the wave of RE porn that was so prevalent in so many publications from 2006-2008?