Mike Nuzzo,
If I was going to develop a course in Cuba and thought that branding was not necessary, you and Don would be my picks to design and build. As Steve Lapper notes, the land is not exceptional and it would require great creativity and effort to get something really good out of it. I must confess that I have thought about it from time to time, but I won't live to see the day.
Jim,
Perhaps I misunderstood the purpose of your original post citing the FSU polling. Apparently it was not to reinforce Obama's foreign policy vis-à-vis Cuba. My bad. No "false equivalencies" there.
Craig Sweet,
Thanks for the good laugh. I fully concur with your self-assessment.
Brad Tufts,
Shush! Let the fantasy continue.
David Schmidt,
Quit being such an a--h---! I've actually known several lefties who whine incessantly about the free stuff they get.
But since you bring up Christmas, my son is planning to tell his 2 year-old daughter that Santa doesn't exist (wants to be "truthful"). Should and how do I intervene. I am convinced that she'll be among the most enthusiastic members of the 80%.
Dick,
Man, I feel your pain. Having read your lengthy piece, twice, I think that maybe you're trying to tell me in 1k words that I am full of shit. You might have saved both of us some time, though quite a Rorschach. Reading it, I was reminded of the time when I heard Hank Haney tell one of his pupils with some frustration that the poor chap's swing was in so many planes he didn't know which one to look at. I guess that I should be impressed with all my debating ploys and the many fallacious arguments I made without a huge number of words (btw, thanks for not calling me a sophist this time). Have you heard of the term "projection"? Might be worth looking up.
Perhaps you misunderstood my comments about investing union pension money in Cuba. While I haven't personally worked with union pension funds in acquiring real estate, I am very aware that such investments are common (and BTW, I have played the original course at Half Moon Bay; liked it). One such investment right here in Dallas has been in the "limelight" for awhile.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-20/dallas-tower-dithers-as-glass-roasts-museum-masterpieces.html Apparently, the police union in Dallas is no less the ruthless capitalist than the CEOs and the "1%" you seem to hate so much. It is so noble, highly principled, and civically-minded to be generous with other people's money. Apparently, not so much when it is your own.
Labor unions here and all over the world emphasize uniting, working together, being "in for the struggle". They may not sport the hammer and sickle logo on their shirts, but the rhetoric and tactics are more in line with the socialists than the capitalist enterprises they depend on for their livelihood.
In the normalization of Cuba and to help the good working people get on their feet, it would just seem to follow that our comparatively rich unions would want to help their needy comrades with some investment to build a more "balanced", socially conscious society. If fellow socialists don't want to lend a helping hand, how can you reasonably expect a filthy, unethical capitalist to do so? But I digress. Anybody suggesting putting money into Cuba while the communists have any power should change the title in his business card from Investments to Philanthropy.
I just have to laugh at your canned, repetitive rhetoric- "laissez faire, dog eat dog, unregulated and unethical capitalism". You sound just like the villain protagonist in "Atlas Shrugged". I was not aware that you were that old to remember the time before Woodrow Wilson. With government spending accounting for over 40% of GDP, it must be hard for you to keep a straight face and repeat such nonsense. In a country where a little girl has to get a permit from the government to sell lemonade on a corner in her neighborhood, whose dog is doing the eating?
Re: normalizing relations with Cuba and eventually ending the embargo, I am mostly indifferent. The Castros are very near their sunset- some believe that Fidel is already being preserved in formaldehyde- and I am not sure that their successors can sustain the extreme repression without a sugar daddy. Unfortunately, like parts of the old Soviet Union that we visited last year, the population has been reduced to supplicants for their livelihood, the change is like coming out into bright sunlight after being stuck in a dark dungeon for years. A large number won't be able to cope and will likely yearn the former tediousness of subsistence. It is extremely hard to watch the death of the human spirit. Had President Obama negotiated something positive in the interest of both countries and involved Congress, I would be much more encouraged. How, when, and what he got does not serve our interests.
Dick, those who are so preoccupied with the concentration of wealth, the unequal outcomes in even heavily regulated economies such as ours are always going to be looking for a different way. You can't change human nature so that those who produce will continue to work just as hard so that those who don't can receive a similar reward. Cuba has tried for over five decades to equate the work of doctors to those of street sweepers. Curiously, it exports doctors to other countries in return for hard currency paid directly to the government while the street sweepers stay home. I guess that even in a socialist utopia, all types of work are not equal after all.
I am sorry that a union cop doesn't earn what the CEO of a small company does. It is simply a function of the service or product each provides and the supply and demand for their respective skills. At least in this country, one has substantial control in determining the path of his life (I know we don't agree on this either). No one points a gun at a student and says "you're going to be a teacher". Who knows, when you came to the fork, had you taken a different path you might have become a CEO or, maybe worse, a hedge fund manager! I guess the grass is always greener on the other side of the pasture.
As a final note, the only thing that will turn things around in Cuba is entrepreneurship and the patriotism of the 1%s among the Cuban-American community. Unfortunately, many are like the Castros, close to their sunset, and their kids are pretty comfortable right here in the good old U.S.A. A likely scenario is that those with rights to significant holdings will press them aggressively and the whole thing turns into a real ugly Cuban cockfight. Mike Nuzzo probably shouldn't wait for my call. And in the word of a much more famous Duran, "no mas"!