News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Jason Way

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A Review of The Year in Golf Architecture
« Reply #25 on: December 16, 2014, 09:24:24 PM »
Week of interviews on golf cannel, with T.D, Jim Urbina, Bill
Coore and Gil Hanse.  

Man, I thought that was last year ... must have been in January?
I wonder if we'll see that again.

I think it was in December last year; at least they taped me in December.

They are going to do it again, in late January 2015.  I just heard from them the other day.

By the way, I think the segment did air in January of 2014.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2014, 09:28:54 PM by Jason Way »
"Golf is a science, the study of a lifetime, in which you can exhaust yourself but never your subject." - David Forgan

Randy Thompson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A Review of The Year in Golf Architecture
« Reply #26 on: December 16, 2014, 10:21:59 PM »
Although its not really about being right or wrong, and to me 12 or 13 months is more or less the same...Technically, I am wrong and the program did not air in 2014, Tom is correct. I searched the site and came up with the week of December 3, 2013 Just for the record!

Jason Way

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A Review of The Year in Golf Architecture
« Reply #27 on: December 16, 2014, 10:23:27 PM »
Although its not really about being right or wrong, and to me 12 or 13 months is more or less the same...Technically, I am wrong and the program did not air in 2014, Tom is correct. I searched the site and came up with the week of December 3, 2013 Just for the record!

My bad too.
"Golf is a science, the study of a lifetime, in which you can exhaust yourself but never your subject." - David Forgan

RJ_Daley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A Review of The Year in Golf Architecture
« Reply #28 on: December 16, 2014, 11:10:09 PM »
Nice recap Ian.  Do you know of a milestone or significant innovation or newly discovered science aspect in turf grass management that was revealed in?
No actual golf rounds were ruined or delayed, nor golf rules broken, in the taking of any photographs that may be displayed by the above forum user.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: A Review of The Year in Golf Architecture
« Reply #29 on: December 16, 2014, 11:12:51 PM »
Although its not really about being right or wrong, and to me 12 or 13 months is more or less the same...Technically, I am wrong and the program did not air in 2014, Tom is correct. I searched the site and came up with the week of December 3, 2013 Just for the record!

Yep.  When they called originally I thought I would have to pass, because I had to be at Royal Melbourne that week.  But fortunately they just wanted to tape my segment whenever I could do it.

Howard Riefs

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A Review of The Year in Golf Architecture
« Reply #30 on: December 17, 2014, 12:15:50 PM »
Although its not really about being right or wrong, and to me 12 or 13 months is more or less the same...Technically, I am wrong and the program did not air in 2014, Tom is correct. I searched the site and came up with the week of December 3, 2013 Just for the record!

My bad too.

http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,57345.0.html
"Golf combines two favorite American pastimes: Taking long walks and hitting things with a stick."  ~P.J. O'Rourke

Pat Burke

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: A Review of The Year in Golf Architecture
« Reply #31 on: December 17, 2014, 01:32:35 PM »
Nice read Ian.

Thanks