For me Desert Forest and We-Ka-Pa Saguaro in Phoenix were this year’s surprise punches to my golf consciousness. The ultimate, total knockout blow, overwhelming my sensory system, was Stone Eagle. I’ve said this before, but that course completely blew my breakers. I have no objective idea how that course stacks up against any other that I’ve seen. I do have this subjective impression about golf courses in general: there is Stone Eagle and then there is everything else. I stood there looking at it and could not believe it was possible. A totally unique golf course. It defies every sensory impression that, in that landscape, it should even exist. I played it like a baboon because I was so blown away it was like I was playing golf on foreign planet. I couldn’t process what I was seeing, much less play the course in front of me. More than any other course I’ve played, I want to play it again just to see if I can get the visual dissonance behind me and treat it like any other golf course.
Perhaps the shocking thing about the Stone Eagle experience, after the utter implausibility that somebody built a golf course there at all, was the conditioning. I guess I expected something to match the rugged landscape (Mars-scape?). To me, a regular golf guy who will enjoy the most primitive conditions, Stone Eagle was the best conditioned golf I’ve ever played. It was perfect, Augusta-like I suppose, and I found myself wondering throughout the round if the designers and builders really expected or even desired such perfection. I expected faster and firmer and browner, not that such lush and beautiful didn’t emphasize the mind-bending contrast with the rugged landscape, but it contributed to blowing the breakers. I’d love to hear (offline) what Tom and his crew really think about such perfect conditioning and about how it matches with their vision of the course they wanted to create. I say “offline” because it must be an incredible complement to the designers that the owners and members want present their golf course in a condition that elevates it to “work-of-art” status. That’s it really: I expected a golf course; what I experienced was a work of landscape art that didn’t just exceed my expectations, it left me speechless and unable to play because I was so visually over stimulated.
I could go on, but it would only be about my personal experience and not add much to any objective or intelligent view the golf course. My view was anything but objective. I was gob-smacked, blown away, and like nothing I’ve ever seen or experienced. Does that make Stone Eagle a great course or nominate me as bumpkin? Don’t know, so I’ll let you decide.