MAtt
I do give Pine Valley (In my top 5, and that's as much as I'll say! )a good number and Plainfield (IS my number too high?) as well. I actually do give a few 10's! Well-deserved 10's. Courses are logarithmically rated, there are a lot of courses out there.
Mike Cirba
As for #12 at Running Deer, even walking all around the fairway and left rough on that hole I failed to see the drama. When they make other improvemnets, I'll stay away from the LONG WET tees, which if they are so bad, one has to wonder the mind with the logic in ever conceiving them. (Doak's 2 comes to mind, something about drinking a lot of beer in a scramble?
In short, they have work to do at Running Deer. With the double and triple hazards, how is one to play in 3 1/2 hours? The group I played through was driving their carts all over hell and creation looking for a ball, arguing in the middle of the fairway whose ball was who who's and oblivious to all nearby. My play time was near the suggested time and no one was even close to catching me, so fast play isn't occurring. (But that's irrelevant)
As for Smyer's work in the Garden State, I played West all to myself and BHP East nearly to my self (Certainly to my threesome's self) and each again at least once. The green complexes at RB are really good. Take #2, 3, 12, 14 15 just as examples. It suffers a routing glitch at 13-15, but it is minor and the course is very walkable. I didn't find any weak holes. BHP suffers from 18 being a let's get this course back to the clubhouse, but is solid in virtually all 18. I personally give a nod to RB west.
A golf course can't have all banal, weak or disjointed par 5's and rate a 7 or even 6 in my book, just for starters. Who here has sais anything good about the 5's at Running Deer.
Also Matt,
Hollywood and Metedeconk I did give 7's. I had to check. I think Metedeconk is not as well recognized as does Geoffrey.