Well, I liked it, but then, I got a hole in one on my first play in 1994, during an ASGCA meeting. Witnessed my Hurdzan, Gary Linn and Mark McCumber, among others. A 5 iron one hop into the cup which was rear center. While excited, I still had the presence of mind to try to be funny, conceding each of my opponents their second shots as "good" even with one in bunker, one in woods, and one of the fringe....
Seriously, thought, its a good but not great hole, with some history that many find makes it that much more interesting.
At first glance, it looks like one of those "straightforward" types of par 3 holes, whereas I prefer the CBM template types generally. But, I do like the ridge separating the green back and front and the varying sizes of different portions of the green.
That ridge works well on a par 3 drop shot - both the ball on a tee, controlled distance and steeper angle of landing make it easier to hold the back part of the green. If some kind of fairway approach level or uphill, the ridge would probably hide the back of the green and make holding the back far too hard for that many folks who don't get enough spin from the fw or rough.
So, in a way, its a straightforward looking par 3, with some unique challenges front and back, and some thought going into the proper location of that particular type of feature, matching it to its intended purpose, which constitutes pretty solid architecture in my book.