Hi Bill,
Firstly, I agree with all that Sean has said but here are my further thoughts if what I have been told is true.
1. Why lengthen it? From the back peg its over 280ish carry, uphill, to the "top" where it runs down to the green. It has a decent green. If the pros want to try and drive it then there is enough risk/reward there for them. Say they pull it back 30 yards....I don't know what that achieves but to make it a long iron and a short iron, which it is for most of us now.
6. Ok. There is room to move the tee back but again, why? Depending on pin positions the 3s at NB can play 130, 160, 180, 210 as a set. Whats the beef?
12. This really annoys me. The burn that most of us don't even think about is now an issue for the old guys off our "new" Medal tee, which has been there for years now. Its supposed to make it harder for pros and low caps but it results in them hitting 7 iron instead of wedge. Whereas the old guys now struggle to carry the burn, which spoils their day and some of them now refuse to play in club Medals. There is no where short of the burn to lay-up as the hole wasn't designed for that. Move it further back? Crazy. Again, a move dictated by having space to do it rather than for architectural reasons.
13. Crazy, no need.
And maybe 17. Fair enough but its already a tough hole. Its the only one I would care about if they did it just for tournaments.
To be fair these tees would probably only be used for maybe 1 tournament a year. I'd rather spend the money to delay the 11th green falling into the sea.