Scott
Whilst it saddens me to hear your report of NSW, it does raise a valid issue.
How relevant and reliable are our memories when it comes to ranking courses?
In the case of my opinion on NSW, I'm basing my opinion on a 20 year old memory. I'm also making claims that several courses could be positioned higher, when in reality, there are a handful of courses in the top 50, relative to the statement, that I've never even seen. The same could be said for Mike's opinions on Port Fairy...should be top 30, but has never seen The Cut and Joondalup is a 25 year old memory. How can any Top 100 list be taken seriously when there are such gaping holes in the methodology?
Four years ago I showed some video footage to three friends, two tour pros and a single figure marker. The video was of a few golf holes filmed from the players perspective in 3D with some high end 4k cinema cameras. The theory was that a golfers performance could be improved by viewing the course in 3D, in a similar fashion to how F1 drivers prepare by using 3D simulators prior to race day. During the discussion that followed, the question was raised, "Could you rank a golf course based upon the imagery?". Most agreed that it could, whilst even the devil's advocate agreed that the 3D imagery would certainly help refresh "course rankers" minds.
I would urge anyone who has an interest in golf course architecture and rankings to at least take a look and judge for yourself. We don't rank the courses, clearly I'm a poor judge!. We provide a valuable tool for those who wish to further their knowledge and "refresh" their memories regarding golf courses.
Out of curiosity- one of the courses featured in 3D on our site doesn't have a review on Jim's website, is never mentioned in any list or rankings (world), but is highly regarded amongst my peers who have seen it in 3D. Many would even argue that it belongs in the World Top 100!!!!.
Judge for yourself, PM your address and I'll send you some 3D Glasses- you can view the 3D on a conventional 2D monitor.
Let the great course debate continue.