We may get some focus on architecture and the restoration, but probably not much beyond the usual, "why did Pinehurst take out the rough and bring back waste areas". Even if the focus on the course is positive, I think we are kidding ourselves if we think this is going to lead to a change in how owners, keepers and members at most courses maintain their courses. In other words, I don't think one week is going to lead to a revolution in favor of brown or firm & fast conditions. I think the main focus of the media and fans will be on whether Phil can win his first US Open, rather than the course. The media also is sure to focus heavily on Tiger's absence.
I think the back-to-back Opens will force the USGA to back off on conditions, so we may see a somewhat softer course (combined with the weather) that will mean a winning score of -5.
I think (and hope) that Adam Scott is primed to win his second major. A dark horse could be Steve Stricker.
Overall, I have to say that I'm not particularly excited about this US Open, and I think the back-to-back Opens are a gimmick. I'm not sure whether it's the fact that I've not played Pinehurst, but for some reason it just doesn't interest me as much as an Open at Shinnecock or Oakmont (or even Erin Hills will). Hopefully my attitude will change after watching some of the coverage, but I'll be playing golf instead of watching this weekend.