I'm curious after reading the answers to this as to what it says about how each of us individually view golf architecture
David...
I love this question.
For me, the highlight of my rounds, in terms of golf architecture, are those "WOW" moments regarding shots required and/or options available. Things you don't see every day, moments of uniqueness that might be specific to certain pieces of property or specific courses. Or, at least, stuff you don't see every day.
Things like...
The Alps hole at NGLA...really neat and fun for me to try to play.
Perfection at North Berwick (come to think of it, lots of holes at North Berwick)
The 9th tee shot at Dismal Doak with the angled gorge carry and the dunes in the background...neat.
9th hole at Kingsley...unique, cool.
10 at Riviera...unique, challenging.
13 at ANGC...such a unique approach shot and a tough decision to make
I'll stop now, as I think you get the point.
With this in mind, I prefer match play to stroke play...as I don't mind a 2 and 20 hole. I think they are fun, especially if you feel the pressure in the match to try to go for the 2, but risk the 20. If I'm playing these holes in a non-match format (a round just for fun), I think it is cool to try to hit interesting shots into those kinds of holes. That to me is fun.