Matt,
I am glad you had a chance to come and play at ACE, but I am disapointed that you did not take the time to talk with me. I unfortunatly did not meet everyone in attendance but would have enjoyed discussing the merits of the course with you.
I am a self professed lurker on this site and I check in periodically to read through some of the threads. I find it interesting to read the various opinions, educated or not.
I do have a few responses to your interpretations of the course. I am always fascinated to read hole descriptions by people not intimate with a project.
The opening of the course was dictated by the schedules of the owners and Gary Player. Everyone recognizes that the course conditions will improve with time, holes 1 and 9 are only 8 weeks old. Superintendent John Canavan and his staff are doing a great job and we are all confident the course will be in prime condition throughout by next season.
The fact that the course is built to 7471 yards has far more to do with the topography and wind effects than addressing the needs of a theoretical professional tournament. You played the course from the white markers at around 6700 yards. With 9 of the holes playing substantially downhill, the course plays significantly shorter than the listed distance. Add a wind similar to Tuesday and a course set up at 6700 will play much more like 6350.
Hole 4: I can understand how this par three may seem bland to you following the drama of the 476 yard 2nd and 610 yard 3rd. The three fronting bunkers are offset at an angle to create indecision on club selection. Once the crowned green firms and the wrap around approach matures, this mid iron hole will provide plenty of challenge. Additionally, the design calls for the restoration of a wall which ran perpendicular to play, short of the bunkers. This wall was displaced by a regulatory agency required sediment trap. Sections of the wall remain in the trees to the right and will serve as the model when completed under the direction of John Canavan this fall or next spring.
Hole 5: I disagree with your ascertion that this hole provides options only for the weaker player. If played from the correct tees the options are afforded to every one as well as the penalty for failure to execute.
Hole 9: Many people have picked this as their favorite hole and I agree that the eye candy has impact on that decision. The fact that the hole offers three different routes on the second shot just makes it fun. When the fescues mature on the left, right and background it will achieve the softer look you refer to, remember this hole is an 8 week old baby. In regard to the stream, this feature evolved during the permitting stage of the project when old plans and photos revealed the existence of a spring long since rerouted through pipe, was not the idea of Mr. Player and has no connection to the 3rd at Jasna Polana, a course which I have intentionally not yet visited.
Holes 16 and 17: Hole 18, your self professed favorite par 5 on the course, required more shaping and earthwork than holes 16 and 17 combined. I find it ironic that you believe the 16th is forced with all the supposed shaping that took place. Hole 16 was made possible by the construction of the wall on the underside of the fairway. This wall allowed us to mitigate some of the severity of the existing cross slope. The fairway is at natural grade with the exception of the fill behind the wall. The shaping that took place was to work in the low and high side fairway bunkers and to create the cart path and diversion swale along the upperside of the hole. Similarly the 17th fairway sits in what was the pond on old hole 16, this of course was filled. The right side of the hole is worked off of what was the dam from the pond, creating the drop off down to the stream corridor.I wonder if your interpretation of excessive shaping is the fairway grading to create catchments for storm water on the left side of the hole. As with 16 there is a large watershed dumping down onto 17, these depressions are a part of the drainage system and also provide for fairway contouring and varied lies. The biggest aspect of the shaping on this hole was to tie the green complex back into the rear land form extending down from hole 1.
Hole 18: You short changed the strategy description on this one. The second shot provides two options, stay right of the 2nd landing area bunker and you have to deal with the carry of the green side lake on your third, carry the 2nd landing area bunker and the green opens up, beware though, at this line the slope to the lower right tier of the green can more easily draw in your ball.
I belive I made the offer of showing the course to Mike C in the past but he has yet to take me up on it. Let me know if at some time in the future you and others would like to tour the course.