I just received my Golf Magazine issue and the biggest surprise to me was how few raters they have. How in the world do they expect to rate all of those courses? A place like Kingsley probably saw 2 raters if that many. While the GM panelists may be "in the golf business", I prefer the GD way and assign courses to their legion of panelists. They may not be professionals, but, for the most part, they appreciate the game of golf.
I was also surprised at how low the architects rated Pac Dunes while the rest of the group rated it very high. I am still surprised that Shadow Creek continues to drop. It is an architectural marvel IMHO.