I agree Tommy. Trees can be the source of plenty of emotion, and can become a large part of the golf course character, negative or positive.
I also don't totally dislike trees. It depends on the course setting, climate and native terrain. I think one of the great mistakes gets down to the species of trees. We all know the quick landscape simple mindedness that was prevalent in the 50s, with committees, supers that had autonomy to do what they liked, and even some golf architects who planted many coniferous trees willy-nilly. they were used as barriers and separation between FWs, forcing directional play at open doglegs on unremarkable terrain, and generally, golf design and integrity of the field of play was the last consideration.
Yet, many a parkland setting is greatly enhanced by trees on a golf course. They serve a fair element of strategy if they are in proportion to the 3-D space to be negotiated tee to green. Hardwood deciduous trees, selected for shape, beauty, and not the messy ones that are big brittle branch shedders and crappy leafy mess producers add to the experience on the parkland courses, IMO. They are just not appreciated if purposely planted in the sand hills and links terrain where no native trees exist in the first place.