TD,
That was great and it occurred to me that--while not the entire ball of wax--that procedure (Where are the divots -- put the bunkers there) is really the junction of so many "aesthetical" threads about "Nature," "Natural Design" "Is Golf Art or Science?" "Isn't it all artifice?" etc...all stimulating to their degree, but few conclusions to be drawn.
That Braid communique, even though (perhaps) offered extemporaneously to the club fathers, to me is the perfect union of where the invisible line is crossed between "Natural" and "Designed." I think it embodies where the GCA's imagination must forecast, "Where will, can, possibly, must... the ball go when players I've never seen will hit it?"
After a practical and emotionally satisfying routing has been discovered, this is perhaps the most important function a GCA performs. And that gets more exacting and minute for each shot on each hole, right down to the 3 foot putt...Where might the ball go?
but yet, for me those considerations are still a junction point...not yet entirely DESIGNED, nor entirely NATURAL...on "that" property for "that" shot, it is NATURAL for a flying rolling thing to go "here"...would be true if a shepherd was hitting a round rock or a boy was tumbling down a slope, no "Golf" yet at all...but it is DESIGNED in the very real sense that we are putting a task to it that makes the NATURAL an obstacle, or a feature, or a strategic element of a conjured, designed "game."
Great story to relate...says a lot to me about quite a bit. One of the many reasons I appreciate this site and the people on it.
It was a heisted time-luxury to take 10 minutes to make this post, so I'm sorry I won't be able to respond to any follow-up in quick fashion.
cheers
vk