I was there this week as well, and the experience for me was an enlightening one. As a visual matter, I can't remember the last time I saw a course in such a state (clumpy teeing grounds; patchy fairways with 6" dandelions in places; some good greens, but many affected by dead spots). And yet, I still really enjoyed my time on the course, and would still recommend anyone on the DG that was in the area to at least check it out.
I'll admit it was a bit of a distracting walk, as I was constantly wondering what lead to the current state, and what would be needed to right the ship. But the turf played reasonably predictably, and did not prevent the interesting strategies of the course from rising to the top.
Unfortunately, as a commercial matter it seems like their target market is much less tolerant of these imperfections (again, some of which are quite significant). They have reduced their fees for the time being in light of the current course condition, but for me $50 for 36 holes was more than fair.
As an aside, for any agronomists among us (armchair or otherwise)- I took this picture of a divot taken out of one of the FW dry patches. I know it's not the best picture, but curious to see if anyone has any thoughts. The director of golf's basic message was that more watering was the prescription to get things back to health, but that seemed a bit simplistic to my untrained mind.
-Alan