News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Jim Franklin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« on: September 10, 2013, 09:01:25 AM »
A friend sent me their recently produced video and the course looks pretty good. It looks firm and fast (which is what most here like), but this course generally gets no love. I understand it is in an area with A LOT of competition. I am playing there Friday and look forward to it.
Mr Hurricane

Paul Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2013, 09:09:20 AM »
Jim,

I haven't played it yet, but it is probably the company that it keeps.  I have been fortunate enough to play some of the greats on Long Island: Shinny, NGLA, Maidstone, Friar's Head, Garden City, Piping Rock, Bethpage, etc...  There are still others I want to play, including Hudson Natl.

How would you rank it compared to the others?  I have always heard great things about the course and my next trip it will be on the my list along with Deepdale.

There is a member on this site that hosted a GCA day, I signed up for the trip, but work got in the way.
Paul Jones
pauljones@live.com

Brad Tufts

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2013, 09:46:23 AM »
I played it in 2010 or so and really liked it.

I agree it may be the company it keeps.  The course is in great shape, there are great views, some history, etc.

A few clunker holes that seemed to be a product of the more severe parts of the site, but I think its one of Fazio's better efforts.
So I jump ship in Hong Kong....

Dustin Ferrell

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2013, 10:27:36 AM »
I've played it a few times and generally enjoyed the whole experience.  Would agree that there are a couple awkward holes and some parts of the property are probably not ideal for a golf course, but the views are magnificent and the conditioning was excellent when I played.  Also, on a non course related point, had one of the best meals I've ever had there one night for dinner.  The course is very good, but wouldn't call it great, but the experience overall is fantastic.  The back tees are pretty tough too from what i recall.

Bill Brightly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2013, 12:23:06 PM »
It is a beautiful course, a great setting, and usually in fantastic shape. It is really hard. My biggest criticism is the "razor cut" steep bunker faces which can create some unplayable ball positions. For example, one of my approach irons came up a little short, bounced off the front bunker face and came to rest a foot or so in front of the back bunker face. The two foot high wall was so steep that I had no swing and I had to play out sideways. No recovery was possible. I guess you could say I deserved a stiff penalty because I hit it in a hazard, but I don't see the fun in that.

Patrick_Mucci

Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2013, 09:26:36 PM »
Is it easily walkable ?

Tommy Williamsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2013, 09:37:21 PM »
Jim, I went thinking I wouldn't like the course very much.  I was wrong.  I thought it was excellent.  The terrain is wild and the course matches it.  It  doesn't feel like what we have grown to expect from Fazio, although that could be said a a few other of his courses.  It is a tough walk because of the hills but well worth the time.  Stay for dinner. They have a pretty good chef.
Where there is no love, put love; there you will find love.
St. John of the Cross

"Deep within your soul-space is a magnificent cathedral where you are sweet beyond telling." Rumi

Pete_Pittock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2013, 09:52:12 PM »
It is a beautiful course, a great setting, and usually in fantastic shape. It is really hard. My biggest criticism is the "razor cut" steep bunker faces which can create some unplayable ball positions. For example, one of my approach irons came up a little short, bounced off the front bunker face and came to rest a foot or so in front of the back bunker face. The two foot high wall was so steep that I had no swing and I had to play out sideways. No recovery was possible. I guess you could say I deserved a stiff penalty because I hit it in a hazard, but I don't see the fun in that.

pretty much the same 'penalty' as in a St Andrews pot bunker?

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2013, 03:13:11 AM »
It is a beautiful course, a great setting, and usually in fantastic shape. It is really hard. My biggest criticism is the "razor cut" steep bunker faces which can create some unplayable ball positions. For example, one of my approach irons came up a little short, bounced off the front bunker face and came to rest a foot or so in front of the back bunker face. The two foot high wall was so steep that I had no swing and I had to play out sideways. No recovery was possible. I guess you could say I deserved a stiff penalty because I hit it in a hazard, but I don't see the fun in that.

But you see the fun in hitting from sand up a steep 15-20 foot bank ;)?

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Jim Franklin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2013, 08:49:24 AM »
Is it easily walkable ?

A little exercise does the body good.
Mr Hurricane

Bill Brightly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site? New
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2013, 11:46:33 AM »
Pete,

I knew that I was subject to that (fair) comment when I made my post. However, Hudson National and TOC have almost  nothing in common. HN is a prototypical, superbly maintained US parkland course. The challenges presented are far different than a links course. So while I can accept such a lie on TOC, it is harder for me personally to accept such a penalty on a tough parkland course. It is not as if the player is waltzing around an easy course and then hits a loose iron where he shouldn't have...

Sean,

At least with a 15-20 foot high bunker face, I can try to aim it at the green, even if I can't see the green!
« Last Edit: September 11, 2013, 02:31:09 PM by Bill Brightly »

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site?
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2013, 12:30:26 PM »
the views are magnificent and the conditioning was excellent when I played.  Also, on a non course related point, had one of the best meals I've ever had there

FYI, the previous two points were not really about the golf course, either.

V. Kmetz

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Hudson National - Why no love on this site? New
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2013, 12:46:16 PM »

ggg
« Last Edit: October 28, 2015, 04:43:12 PM by V. Kmetz »
"The tee shot must first be hit straight and long between a vast bunker on the left which whispers 'slice' in the player's ear, and a wilderness on the right which induces a hurried hook." -