Sadly you continue to misrepresent what I asked. Why do you do that?
If you would stop feeling challenged and respond to the questions asked it would be so much easier to have an intelligent discussion.
You're questions are structured to arrive at your conclusion. What I wanted to know was whether whoever took the core samples did it for all 18 greens.
No, they only did the 9th green because it was rumored to be an old indian campfire site where they buried the embers from the campfires.
Try reading the prior posts.If they did that would support your assertion that this was a uniform practice across all the greens on the course.
See the response aboveI understand that they took core samples from the front of the current 9th green, but that you didn't know if they took core samples from the swale (based on one of your previous posts).
That's not true, reread my replies.I further wanted to know if they (whoever they are) took core samples from approaches to other greens on the course. I wasn't sure why they would if they were just trying to determine the profiles of the greens.
Let me answer your question with a question.
Don't you think that they'd want to know where the greens began and ended ?
Where the charcoal existed and where it didn't exist.
Has some flaming moron broken into your computer and been posting under your name ? If they did take cores from other approaches, surrounds or fairways and found no charcoal that would support your contention that the charcoal layer was unique to the greens there.
Thank youSince you never explained where or why the core samples were taken, I thought I'd ask. Why is that so offensive to you?
Because I previously answered/addressed that issue, yet you repeat your questions as if they were never addressed.You state above that:
"Core samples have been taken from the approaches and the charcoal layer doesn't exist."
Could you expand a little on that statement.
NOI'm trying to understand the methodology of whatever they were trying to do with taking the core samples.
You'll have to ponder that.Since the premise of your argument is based primarily on the finding of the charcoal, it would help to understand how and where the coring was done.
What difference does it make ?
I already answered the above query, didn't you read the answer ?Would it help if I said I love ya.
Not unless you were a moron and sitting on a chest near the first tee at Streamsong [/quote]