LN's reno is an alarming trend. Many on the discussion have hit it square on. For all the $ and work, they should have done better with the shot values and even more so, with the character. Yeah, yeah, yeah, the Statue is right there. But it lacks any charm of its own. The course was geared towards the Tour player and was a dredge for the average. Ooops, pardon the 4 million cubic yard pun. Now, the changes will do little for the members, but mollify the Tour. For Chrissake, guys, ur playing for a boat load of cash. Peg it, putt it, and shut the hell up.
Who exactly are the members you're referring to? I don't know too many of them, but here's a breakdown of the ones I do know:
1. An LPGA Tour player
2. A PGA Tour legend
3. A billionaire who spent his own money to do the renovation and is very happy with it
4. A New York resident who is very happy with the renovation
5. A New York icon who is as strongly connected to the city as anyone, and no doubt loves the views of downtown and the city's grandeur
6. Robert Kraft. I don't know much about how he feels about the golf, but I've got to assume he wouldn't spend extra time in New York if he didn't like being there.
So the renovations made the course more interesting for Tour players, didn't diminish the looming influence of the city, and were paid for by members who are happy with the results. How exactly is that a failure for a course whose members are Tour players and city icons and golfers who are happy with the course?