John,
At the end of the day, its basically an issue of permission.
If one has to get special permission to play a course, whether its thru a phone call or nicely written letter or a pro setting up reciprocal play... its a private course. But if they advertise limted tee times for anyone to show up and pay like the UK model or a Pasatiempo, then its semi-private.
Its really no more complicated than that.
I agree. I don't care about squabbling over the definitions or what certain words my convey, it is the concept. I am a member of a club and it is for use by members and their guests. There are various ways to get access by non members, i.e. Monday outings, unaccompanied play sponsored by a member, maybe even a trial round for perspective members. Who cares if that may change someone's definition to fit their view. We know the boundaries of what a private golf club is and typically it includes some of the above, call it what you will.
Also in regards to the actual topic of this thread, which is the future of private club in the US, a couple thoughts:1. Consolidation, market efficiency, whatever you want to call survival of the fittest will prevail and the weak will fail the strong will survive. Some clubs will fail and there will be less is for certain IMO.
2. The status quo is always hard to change and I don't think anything fundamental about the model will change. Initiations will be there (smaller for less prestigious clubs), however with the key to keep dues paying members at a premium over the initiations. If you lower the cost of entry, but gain a long term member that is more valuable as it is an annuity as opposed to a lump sum for clubs.
3. I like the UK model of having members with preferred tee times or days for play then guest play at certain times or other days. More cost efficient to operate as the pool of golfers decreases you are appealing to more of that demographic to make ends meet. Top clubs won't do this, but others will convert to semi-private first and hopefully survive or die.
4. Youth programs we will always have high hopes for, but because of kids having so many options to spend their time and digital games etc. I think golf has a hard time keeping their attention and isn't for a large population of the youth as a result. Not an easy sell, so youth participation will continue to disappoint unfortunately.
5. I think you can get more women to play and this should be encouraged more than it is. Having a spouse who plays is a wonderful thing IMO, but not as common for various reasons. there is an adversarial relationship at golf clubs between the men and women for very trivial reasons. Embrace and come up with innovations to increase their participation at private clubs. I don't have the answers, but it takes a varied think tank of people to brainstorm that.
BTW can we call Cypress Point semi-private as they used to (or maybe still do) allow unaccompanied play sponsored by members?