Mike,
I agree that many clubs have switched to smaller and lighter weight equipment, but is this a bad thing? If yes, why?
Bill,
Nothing wrong with it except this photo shows that even the best courses were able to maintain at an acceptable level with less money. The lighter weight mowers require much more care than the mowers pictured...
Acceptable at that time, yes. Acceptable now? Not a chance. There wasn't really anything better equipment, so that's what was used. Maybe this was a one time pic or maybe it was after some cultural practices. In 1991, lightweight mowers were hitting the market and most courses of the caliber of CP were walk mowing greens, also.
"...the real problem is that the younger guys don't think you can maintain like this...AND it was not an emergency situation...."
Come on, Mike. 95% of American golfer won’t accept or want fairways mowed above 1/2" and laid over. I do not think that you would have a quality bentgrass fairway with a gang mower. There would also be more times than not you couldn't mow fairways because of the weight of the machines. The quality of cuts are much better with hydraulic mowers, the number of blades per reel is higher.
Some of the mom and pop courses in the world still mow with gang mowers, if they can find parts or maybe do not do any maintenance on them. There are even a few courses that were designed to be mowed with a gang mower-Longshadow and Diamond Springs. Don’t for a second think that the quality is not 100x better than it once was.
And I have to agree with Ian…your courses are built with $150k dozers, $250k off road dumptrucks, $200k excavators and $750k scapers. It would not be acceptable if you didn't build that way.