I have only seen Sebonac from National, and that three years ago, and I'm not quite as familiar with the Ladies styles and yardages of play as I am with the men. I loved watching the Ladies US Open contested at Newport.
However, I do not know quite how to take this run-up to the Mens US Open where the conversation is all about "the weather"
Theory 1: if the weather is fair, the course will be impossible
Theory 2: if the weather sees any mild rain, they will destroy it
Theory 3: if there's a spate of truly bad weather, certain holes may not be able to be played, and they will deploy West course holes to finish the tournament.
I don't know how much of this back and forth dovetails with what we most often discuss here, regarding B&I and other negative evolution and "restoration" push-backs or if it's a glut of over-coverage and over-opinion now that we access more opinion and coverage than ever before.
In either case, I can't help but thinking that this US Open stands a chance to be remembered for its gerrymandered "goofiness" rather than the exhibition of elite play it produced...a la Shinnecock 04, when goofiness overshadowed (imo) the play of the top competitors and Goosen merely "survived" with timely stellar play (like that short chip/pitch on #14...perhaps the greatest pressure finesse I've seen since Watson 1982).
cheers
vk