Should tee-markers be set so that the entire teeing ground is within the "teeing area"?
I'm using the term "teeing area" to define the larger, level and closely mown area on which the tee-markers are set to create the "teeing ground" as defined by the rules: "The 'teeing ground' is the starting place for the hole to be played. It is a rectangular area two club-lengths in depth, the front and the sides of which are defined by the outside limits of two tee-markers. . . ."
No rule of golf that I am aware of requires that the "teeing ground" be level or closely mown, yet the practice is to make the teeing area level and keep it closely mown, so that the golfer comes to expect that the teeing ground within it will also be level and closely mown.
Let's assume two club lengths = 7.5 feet. Would you say that the tee markers should always be set so that the depth of the teeing ground on the teeing area is 7.5 feet? Or, would it be "o.k." to set the tee markers so far back in the teeing area that there is only 3.5 feet (for example) in depth of the teeing ground on the teeing area, with the remaining 3 feet of depth of the teeing ground being outside the teeing ground, that is, on ground that is not level or not closely mown, or both? As I read the rules of golf – no problem with this sort of set up. But, what do you think of it?
Yes, I am keeping in mind that except sometimes on par threes we tee as far forward as possible, so that from the tee-ball stand point the back part of the teeing ground is irrelevant. Moreover, where the teeing area is relatively small, practical considerations of turf maintenance may demand that the tee markers be set less than 7.5 feet from the back of the teeing area. Finally, I am aware that the term "teeing ground" has theoretical significance beyond that of where a player may lawfully tee his or her ball.