News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.


Joe Bentham

  • Karma: +0/-0

Craig Sweet

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2013, 08:44:29 AM »
The article starts out promising and then pretty much sticks to how this proposal will or won't benefit humans. It even goes so far as to say the land that Keiser wants is hardly ever visited by humans.  But the last time I checked, natural areas are set aside for NON HUMANS and the area seems to have lots of non human residents and visitors.

The next time someone says you never hear the peeper frogs at night anymore, or you never see any of those birds around here anymore, its because people have run them off their habitat for golf courses, shopping centers, housing tracts...all in the name of greed.
LOCK HIM UP!!!

Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2013, 08:47:21 AM »
We are just as natural as any other creature on this planet. Curtail the greed of the beaver when changing the landscape to suit it's purpose and then get back to me.

Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2013, 09:04:10 AM »
If we kill off the entire human race just think how great the planet will be!  A bit of perspective:  Approximately 95% of the U.S.' land remains undeveloped.
Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Alex Miller

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2013, 10:47:50 AM »
Carla Smith's comments exude "class." While not the quality of the Bandon Resort courses, Bandon Crossings is a fun and interesting track and priced as such. I hope this muni complex is a good thing for Bandon Crossings and if I spend a day playing the muni course(s) Bandon Crossings would seem the perfect compliment after 18 or 36 to just relax with beer in hand in cart.

Jon Wiggett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2013, 12:52:32 PM »
Nice to see some of the well balanced views of some on this forum ::)

Jeff,

if all we were doing was to ensure our daily survival then you might have a valid point about the beaver but I fail to see how much of what we do do is for daily survival. Having said that, if done with proper consideration then it could be at least neutral with its impact on the natural environment.

I am surprised that Mr. Keiser has never dropped in on his neighbour to say hello. If the project does not go ahead maybe the Bandon Resort could work with Bandon Crossings to create their vision?

Jon

Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2013, 02:08:09 PM »
Yes, I went over the top a little, but to make a point. However, daily survival eliminates the need for even 1 golf course and hence, the need for this forum. As for well balanced, that is a matter of definition.

I hope you can expand on this thought: "Having said that, if done with proper consideration then it could be at least neutral with its impact on the natural environment." How can building a golf course have a neutral impact on the natural environment? Clearing one shrub to make a tee box can hardly be neutral. Which environment are we talking about? Did NGLA disturb the natural environment or did it create a new natural environment?

I responded to a statement that I felt could not be defended. Funny, I never thought of food, clothing, and shelter as having no value beyond serving someone's greed. Should we not build a home so that we might preserve a bird call? I await a well balanced response.

Jon Wiggett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2013, 04:02:32 PM »
Correct Jeff, we don't need golf courses to survive where as a beaver builds a dam in order to survive so your point was a little bit over the top in an 'atom bomb to kill a fly' sort of way.

In order to have a neutral effect on the environment a golf course needs to undertake mitigating action to balance out the overall picture. This is something that is done already in many lands around the world. Neutral does not mean not effecting/disturbing anything.

I would be interested in knowing what statement you felt could not be defended and also what NGLA has to do with it.

Jon


Connor Dougherty

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #8 on: April 10, 2013, 04:13:20 PM »
Yes, I went over the top a little, but to make a point. However, daily survival eliminates the need for even 1 golf course and hence, the need for this forum. As for well balanced, that is a matter of definition.

I hope you can expand on this thought: "Having said that, if done with proper consideration then it could be at least neutral with its impact on the natural environment." How can building a golf course have a neutral impact on the natural environment? Clearing one shrub to make a tee box can hardly be neutral. Which environment are we talking about? Did NGLA disturb the natural environment or did it create a new natural environment?

I responded to a statement that I felt could not be defended. Funny, I never thought of food, clothing, and shelter as having no value beyond serving someone's greed. Should we not build a home so that we might preserve a bird call? I await a well balanced response.

Jeff,
I do think there are ways to make a golf course have a neutral effect on the environment. It may apply to your definition of NGLA having a "new natural environment," but introducing golf courses can often create a barrier between predators and the species being protected that are beneficial to the animals in question. Such is the case at Sharp Park, where environmentalists have been pushing to rid of the golf course despite all scientific evidence pointing to the golf course being beneficial to the species in question (helps keep predators out and the maintenance practices for the course are all organic). In fact, the construction of the seawall and the golf course are really the reason the frog and snake have that habitat.

I don't mean to say that the area in question is going to be beneficial for the species involved (Even after reading the article, there's not nearly enough information) but we should not be rushing to conclusions. That would be like saying the construction of Machrihanish Dunes was incredibly harmful for the environment based on the environmental impact from Trump International Golf Links.
"The website is just one great post away from changing the world of golf architecture.  Make it." --Bart Bradley

Emile Bonfiglio

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #9 on: April 10, 2013, 10:02:38 PM »
Thanks for posting Joe. As an Oregonian I can say it is amazing that Mr. K has been able to accomplish what he has in the great state. In my town if I want to cut down a tree or remove a shrub I have to apply for a permit, wait 30 days and if 1 neighbor wants me to keep it...we go before a public hearing....this article shows me nothing new about the process.
You can follow me on twitter @luxhomemagpdx or instagram @option720

Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2013, 09:10:59 AM »
Correct Jeff, we don't need golf courses to survive where as a beaver builds a dam in order to survive so your point was a little bit over the top in an 'atom bomb to kill a fly' sort of way.

In order to have a neutral effect on the environment a golf course needs to undertake mitigating action to balance out the overall picture. This is something that is done already in many lands around the world. Neutral does not mean not effecting/disturbing anything.

I would be interested in knowing what statement you felt could not be defended and also what NGLA has to do with it.

Jon



Thanks for responding Jon. The statement I referred to dealt with human creations for greed and that those creations are harmful to the environment. The history of NGLA is well known. The land they found was hardly what it looks like today. Should we call that natural or does what we see today qualify as natural? Obviously a beaver dam is natural but it hardly looks like what was there before it (which some would argue as natural). Definitions drive this discussion. I only wish to include human activity into the equation. There are plenty of examples where the environmental goal is to remove the human fingerprint from the landscape. I disagree. As for mitigation balancing out the overall picture, that regulatory standard is a bit too subjective for my taste. I understand we have to start somewhere but mitigation is not the same thing as what was previously "undisturbed".

Paul Gray

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2013, 10:27:28 AM »
We are just as natural as any other creature on this planet. Curtail the greed of the beaver when changing the landscape to suit it's purpose and then get back to me.

Or, persuade me that beaver are highly intelligent beings with self awareness and then get back to me.
In the places where golf cuts through pretension and elitism, it thrives and will continue to thrive because the simple virtues of the game and its attendant culture are allowed to be most apparent. - Tim Gavrich

Craig Van Egmond

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2013, 09:01:44 AM »
We are just as natural as any other creature on this planet. Curtail the greed of the beaver when changing the landscape to suit it's purpose and then get back to me.

Or, persuade me that beaver are highly intelligent beings with self awareness and then get back to me.

Beavers kill!!!   http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20130411/NEWS02/130411028

Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #13 on: April 12, 2013, 10:48:34 AM »
Not only are strict environmental regulations required to reign in the beaver, thorough background checks should be implemented as well.

William_G

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2013, 02:01:04 PM »
No doubt that you only need to look at Bandon Dunes Resort to see a massive public benefit to the local economy.

Bandon Crossings was built subsequent to and because of the success of Bandon Dunes, Rex Smith is the golfer(podiatrist) in the family while his wife is the mover/shaker. For those in the area that want golf in a golf cart, Crossings is it!

It should all work out well for everyone and Bandon Muni will be built.
It's all about the golf!

William_G

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2013, 08:45:27 AM »
Preliminary deall in place  8)

http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-tours-news/blogs/local-knowledge/2013/05/mike-keiser-gets-land-needed-to-create-bandon-muni.html

congrats to Mike Keiser and everyone else involved including the late Howard McKee
It's all about the golf!

Brad Klein

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2013, 09:44:21 PM »
It's not quite a deal, but some common ground has been found: http://golfweek.com/news/2013/may/16/bandon-dunes-municipal-course-plans/

Ulrich Mayring

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2013, 01:02:58 PM »
I don't understand. It is supposed to be a municipal project, so surely the land must be owned and the golf course operated by the municipality. But the article says that Mike Keiser needs land from the municipality and will himself own and operate the course. So what exactly is municipal about this project? Isn't the resort operating under the same public pay & play scheme?

Ulrich
Golf Course Exposé (300+ courses reviewed), Golf CV (how I keep track of 'em)

Ross Harmon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #18 on: July 01, 2013, 11:45:54 PM »
The difference with Bandon "Muni" is that 9 holes each day will be set aside for Bandon (or area) residents only and they will pay a substantially cut rate. That said, I hate the name and seriously hope they figure out something better.

Ulrich Mayring

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2013, 02:46:00 AM »
And the other 18 holes are for tourists, who pay resort prices?

I wonder whether locals won't feel exactly the opposite: that 18 holes are reserved for tourists and they are stuck with a 9 holer.

Ulrich
Golf Course Exposé (300+ courses reviewed), Golf CV (how I keep track of 'em)

Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2013, 07:49:05 AM »
Ulrich,

They'll be free to pay the tourist prices like the rest of us if they so choose.
Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Steve Lang

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2013, 02:10:03 PM »
Carla Smith's comments exude "class." While not the quality of the Bandon Resort courses, Bandon Crossings is a fun and interesting track and priced as such. I hope this muni complex is a good thing for Bandon Crossings and if I spend a day playing the muni course(s) Bandon Crossings would seem the perfect compliment after 18 or 36 to just relax with beer in hand in cart.

Alex,  when we played BD couple years ago the caddies for the other two guys with us said they liked Bandon Crossing for exactly those last 9 words in your post.. "to just relax with beer in hand in cart." 

we toured BC, which the guy behind the counter thought was a little odd, but said sure take a cart ..  I'd hate to see the new muni hurt BC's play..
Inverness (Toledo, OH) cathedral clock inscription: "God measures men by what they are. Not what they in wealth possess.  That vibrant message chimes afar.
The voice of Inverness"

Ulrich Mayring

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #22 on: July 02, 2013, 03:24:16 PM »
Jud,

if the locals were willing to pay tourist prices, they would not play Bandon Muni, but one of the resort courses - something which they can already do now. So I guess what it comes down to for the locals is that Bandon Muni is a 9 hole course. Much appreciated as an additional option, no doubt, but not really "municipal" in the usual sense.

Ulrich
Golf Course Exposé (300+ courses reviewed), Golf CV (how I keep track of 'em)

William_G

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #23 on: July 02, 2013, 05:35:19 PM »
Carla Smith's comments exude "class." While not the quality of the Bandon Resort courses, Bandon Crossings is a fun and interesting track and priced as such. I hope this muni complex is a good thing for Bandon Crossings and if I spend a day playing the muni course(s) Bandon Crossings would seem the perfect compliment after 18 or 36 to just relax with beer in hand in cart.

Alex,  when we played BD couple years ago the caddies for the other two guys with us said they liked Bandon Crossing for exactly those last 9 words in your post.. "to just relax with beer in hand in cart."  

we toured BC, which the guy behind the counter thought was a little odd, but said sure take a cart ..  I'd hate to see the new muni hurt BC's play..

The new 27 holes across the highway from Crossings will only help Crossings.
No doubt it is cartish golf due to routing, but it is already a good deal and as more people visit southern Oregon, the better for everyone.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2013, 12:34:19 PM by William_Grieve »
It's all about the golf!

Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Bandon Muni "update"
« Reply #24 on: July 03, 2013, 11:55:50 AM »
Ulrich,

If I were a local I'd be pretty pumped about having an additional rotating 9 designed by Gil Hanse at reasonable rates.
Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back