Yes, I went over the top a little, but to make a point. However, daily survival eliminates the need for even 1 golf course and hence, the need for this forum. As for well balanced, that is a matter of definition.
I hope you can expand on this thought: "Having said that, if done with proper consideration then it could be at least neutral with its impact on the natural environment." How can building a golf course have a neutral impact on the natural environment? Clearing one shrub to make a tee box can hardly be neutral. Which environment are we talking about? Did NGLA disturb the natural environment or did it create a new natural environment?
I responded to a statement that I felt could not be defended. Funny, I never thought of food, clothing, and shelter as having no value beyond serving someone's greed. Should we not build a home so that we might preserve a bird call? I await a well balanced response.