Chris, oofda!
I actually don't see why...
If you...., haven't you....
Perhaps if you read those qualifiers in context, my post wouldn't or shouldn't be THAT offensive. These are not accusatory as your reply makes my observations out to be, IMO. I am not so dogmatic on the carts and walking issue as Melvyn, but I sort of understand his POV in a very traditionalist sense of approach to the game.
If one has a device as the modified Segway sort of gizmo in the video, it suggests to me a choice and commitment to play the game in a certain way that suggests one might forgo walking most always. I doubt I'd pay that much for a gizmo like that and then elect to walk very often. Which, IMHO takes a great element of enjoyment and tradition out of the game. I myself have, would, and need a cart on many courses I've played. My body is really going down hill and I suspect it isn't long that I'll need a cart more often, even on courses I always have walked with ease. I have complete sympathy for those that take a cart because they need one to continue to enjoy the game on their own terms. I hope you don't feel anyone is dictating to you how you enjoy the game. I just gave my observations that I don't quite get it that a young and able-bodied individual would choose not to undertake what the USGA and official golfdom 'suggest' is at the least - an element of competition to require walking. When I can't hike it anymore, I'll cross that bridge when I get to it, and if I decide the game has lost its joy with inability to walk, I'll pull the pin and commit golf hari-kari via quitting. That is just me, I don't suggest it nor prescribe it for you.