Thanks for posting the pictures Mac - they do capture the look of the course nicely, albeit i think they are maybe a touch brighter than the course normally looks.
Greg - as you say, each to himself. But i am surprised that your or David should, in turn, be surprised that is so highly ranked. I think it is harsh to describe it as a typical resort course, with all that that connotes. I think the course and the hotel have a very different feel from what you typically get at a resort (in a better way!).
As for the other courses you mention Greg - I have not played Fontainebleau, but I have played the others. They are all good courses but hard to compare classic courses with modern courses. For what it is worth, I liken Chantilly to Sunningdale, which is a compliment - but i can't honestly remember it well enough to make a detailed comparison. Porthcawl has some excellent holes, especially early on, but i think it has a fair number of humdrum holes. As for St Germain - Ran is a big fan, but I would play Oitavos before I played it. I suspect that i think there are more good holes than you and David think. Also, i am definitely biased by the aesthetic - the mix of pines and dunes is more allurign for me than a manicured inland course like St Germain, and also than Porthcawl which feels like a pastoral links, if i can use the phrase, rather than a sandy/beachy links.
St Lorenzo always used to be voted best in Portugal and i think Oitavos is better - but maybe there are others i am missing!
Finally Greg - I think Oitavos now up to 68 on some or other World list, so you have more reason to scratch your head! We all know about lists, of course, and maybe that is "too high" but i do think Oitavos stands apart and above from many/most modern courses in Europe with its links aspirations and the overall ambience of the place.
Philip