Most of those mentioned are good choices, but I'll stick with Teeth of the Dog and The Golf Club as his top two.
LOL How ddi I leave Teeth off? I would put it 2 or 3.
For obvious reasons I compare Teeth with our Ocean Course all the time. It seems apaprent you think Teeth far superior, why?
Ocean front holes? CDS
Interior? CDS
Par 3s? CDS
Par 4s? CDS
Par 5s? TOD
I know you are a Dye guy but...
And being on payroll for the other side is not a bias?
I don't think Teeth of the Dog is "far" superior, but I do rate it higher than Cabo del Sol.
I will admit that when I do hole-by-hole match-ups of Cabo del Sol with other courses, it usually comes out better than I expect, and that's why it's still got my vote for the top 100, even though I can't profess to really LIKING it that much. I've thought for years about why that is, and I've come up with two answers.
First, though both courses are housing developments, the tropical vegetation at Casa de Campo does a lot better job of hiding the development areas than the desert vegetation at Cabo del Sol (or anywhere in Arizona). There is just more variety of texture and color in the landscape, and denser vegetation to screen things when you want them screened.
Second, what makes Teeth of the Dog stand out for me is exactly what most modern courses don't have -- golf features that were built at the human scale. The bunkering and green contouring elements at Teeth of the Dog are very different from most of Mr. Dye's other works, because they were built by hand, by a bunch of Dominican laborers. So you get little random knobs, or the waste bunker on the 10th hole that narrows down to about three feet wide at one point. Those features give the course a certain style that is more like Myopia Hunt Club than anything built in the last 50 or 75 years.
Whereas, Cabo del Sol, like nearly all Nicklaus courses [and ALSO like many Pete Dye courses that I don't rate as highly among Pete's work], is built at the scale of a D-6. In fact, the upper holes are all benched into the slope artificially at D-8 scale, like Whistling Straits or Pete Dye Golf Club, which divorces them from the natural contours of the ground, and makes them seem a bit sterile. It was actually a friend from Asia who clued me into this; pretty much every course in Asia is that way. It doesn't ruin the course for me, but it makes me much less fond of those upper holes of yours than you are, whether they are good strategic holes or not.
Sorry, most of that is OT, but your marketing department would probably prefer that it's on a thread about Pete Dye courses, anyway.